Root and Root Canal Morphology: Study Methods and Classifications

Main Article Content

Duaa M Shihab
Anas F Mahdee

Abstract

Background: Morphology of the root canal system is divergent and unpredictable, and rather linked to clinical complications, which directly affect the treatment outcome. This objective necessitates continuous informative update of the effective clinical and laboratory methods for identifying this anatomy, and classification systems suitable for communication and interpretation in different situations.
Data: Only electronic published papers were searched within this review. Sources: “PubMed” website was the only source used to search for data by using the following keywords "root", "canal", "morphology", "classification".
Study selection: 153 most relevant papers to the topic were selected, especially the original articles and review papers, from 1970 till the 28th of July 2021.
Conclusions: This review divided the root canal analysis methods into two approaches; clinical and in vitro techniques. The latter has shown more precise non-subjective readings, on the other hand; the clinical methods provide direct chair side diagnosis for the clinical cases. The classification systems reviewed in the present study, started with the oldest trials that simply presented the root canal systems, according to the degree of angulation, or by coded Latin numbers or English letters. Then, the most recent systems were also presented that were persisted with continuous editions up to date. These new systems could briefly describe the root and root canal’s internal and external details in a small formulation, without confusion and in an easily communicated manner, highly recommended specially for students, teachers, and researchers

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

1.
Shihab DM, Mahdee AF. Root and Root Canal Morphology: Study Methods and Classifications. J Bagh Coll Dent [Internet]. 2021 Dec. 15 [cited 2024 Dec. 25];33(4):11-9. Available from: https://jbcd.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/jbcd/article/view/3014

References

Shrestha A, Marla V, Shrestha S, Maharjan IK. Developmental anomalies affecting the morphology of teeth–a review. RSBO. 2015;12(1):68-78.

Luder HU. Malformations of the tooth root in humans. Front. Physiol.. 2015;6:307.

Jafarzadeh H, Abbott PV. Dilaceration: review of an endodontic challenge. J Endod. 2007;33(9):1025-30.

Kremeier K, Hülsmann M. Fusion and gemination of teeth: review of the literature, treatment considerations, and report of cases. ENDO. 2007;1(2).

Alani A, Bishop K. Dens invaginatus. Part 1: classification, prevalence and aetiology. Int Endod J. 2008;41(12):1123-36.

Jafarzadeh H, Azarpazhooh A, Mayhall J. Taurodontism: a review of the condition and endodontic treatment challenges. Int Endod J. 2008;41(5):375-88.

Kato A, Ziegler A, Higuchi N, Nakata K, Nakamura H, Ohno N. Aetiology, incidence and morphology of the C‐shaped root canal system and its impact on clinical endodontics. Int Endod J. 2014;47(11):1012-33.

Kim H-J, Choi Y, Yu M-K, Lee K-W, Min K-S. Recognition and management of palatogingival groove for tooth survival: a literature review. JRDE. 2017;42(2):77-86.

Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endod. topics. 2005;10(1):3-29.

Cantatore G, Berutti E, Castellucci A. Missed anatomy: frequency and clinical impact. Endod. topics. 2006;15(1):3-31.

Ahmed H, Versiani M, De‐Deus G, Dummer P. A new system for classifying root and root canal morphology. Int Endod J. 2017;50(8):761-70.

Ahmed HMA, Dummer PM. A new system for classifying tooth, root and canal anomalies. Int Endod J. 2018;51(4):389-404.

Ahmed HMA, Dummer PMH. Advantages and applications of a new system for classifying roots and canal systems in research and clinical practice. Eur Endod J. 2018;3(1):9.

Ahmed H, Neelakantan P, Dummer P. A new system for classifying accessory canal morphology. Int Endod J. 2018;51(2):164-76.

Omer O, Al Shalabi R, Jennings M, Glennon J, Claffey N. A comparison between clearing and radiographic techniques in the study of the root‐canal anatomy of maxillary first and second molars. Int Endod J. 2004;37(5):291-6.

Weng X-L, Yu S-B, Zhao S-L, Wang H-G, Mu T, Tang R-Y, et al. Root canal morphology of permanent maxillary teeth in the Han nationality in Chinese Guanzhong area: a new modified root canal staining technique. J Endod. 2009;35(5):651-6.

Robertson D, Leeb IJ, Mckee M, Brewer E. A clearing technique for the study of root canal systems. J Endod. 1980;6(1):421-4.

Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Subbarao CV. Comparative evaluation of modified canal staining and clearing technique, cone-beam computed tomography, peripheral quantitative computed tomography, spiral computed tomography, and plain and contrast medium-enhanced digital radiography in studying root canal morphology. J Endod. 2010;36(9):1547-51.

Fan B, Gao Y, Fan W, Gutmann JL. Identification of a C-shaped canal system in mandibular second molars—part ii: the effect of bone image superimposition and intraradicular contrast medium on radiograph interpretation. J Endod. 2008;34(2):160-5.

Naoum H, Love R, Chandler N, Herbison P. Effect of X-ray beam angulation and intraradicular contrast medium on radiographic interpretation of lower first molar root canal anatomy. Int Endod J. 2003;36(1):12-9.

Lacerda MF, Marceliano-Alves MF, Pérez AR, Provenzano JC, Neves MA, Pires FR, et al. Cleaning and shaping oval canals with 3 instrumentation systems: a correlative micro–computed tomographic and histologic study. J Endod. 2017;43(11):1878-84.

Plotino G, Grande NM, Pecci R, Bedini R, Pameijer CH, Somma F. Three-dimensional imaging using microcomputed tomography for studying tooth macromorphology. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137(11):1555-61.

Tseng Y-H, Tsai Y-L, Tsai TW, Lin C-P, Huang S-H, Mou C-Y, et al. Double-quantum filtered heteronuclear correlation spectroscopy under magic angle spinning. Solid State Nucl Magn Reson. 2007;31(1):55-61.

Baumann MA, Doll GM, Zick K. Stray-field imaging (STRAFI) of teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993;75(4):517-22.

Appel TR, Baumann MA. Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy demonstrating human dental anatomy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;94(2):256-61.

Peters OA, Peters CI, Schonenberger K, Barbakow F. ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: effects of canal anatomy on final shape analysed by micro CT. Int Endod J. 2003;36(2):86-92.

Bjørndal L, Carlsen O, Thuesen G, Darvann T, Kreiborg S. External and internal macromorphology in 3D‐reconstructed maxillary molars using computerized X‐ray microtomography. Int Endod J. 1999;32(1):3-9.

Dowker S. Nondestructive three-dimensional imaging for in vitro endodontic studies. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1997;83:510-6.

Gantt DG, Kappleman J, Ketcham RA, Alder ME, Deahl TH. Three‐dimensional reconstruction of enamel thickness and volume in humans and hominoids. Eur J Oral Sci. 2006;114:360-4.

Heidrich G, Hassepass F, Dullin C, Attin T, Grabbe E, Hannig C, editors. Non-destructive preclinical evaluation of the root canal anatomy of human teeth using area detector volume CT (FD-VCT). RöFo advances in the field of X-rays and imaging techniques; 2005: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart· New York.

Hannig C, Krieger E, Dullin C, Merten H-A, Attin T, Grabbe E, et al. Volumetry of human molars with flat panel-based volume CT in vitro. Clin. Oral Investig. 2006;10(3):253-7.

Jiang H, Robinson D, Yates C, Lee P, Wark J. Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT)–based finite element analysis provides enhanced diagnostic performance in identifying non-vertebral fracture patients compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int. 2020;31(1):141-51.

Sousa TO, Hassan B, Mirmohammadi H, Shemesh H, Haiter-Neto F. Feasibility of cone-beam computed tomography in detecting lateral canals before and after root canal treatment: an ex vivo study. J Endod. 2017;43(6):1014-7.

Patel S, Dawood A, Ford TP, Whaites E. The potential applications of cone beam computed tomography in the management of endodontic problems. Int Endod J. 2007;40(10):818-30.

Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. Dent J. 2006;72(1):75.

Somma F, Leoni D, Plotino G, Grande N, Plasschaert A. Root canal morphology of the mesiobuccal root of maxillary first molars: a micro‐computed tomographic analysis. Int Endod J. 2009;42(2):165-74.

Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971;32(2):271-5.

Backman CA, Oswald RJ, Pitts DL. A radiographic comparison of two root canal instrumentation techniques. J Endod. 1992;18(1):19-24.

Dobo NC, Bernath, M. and Szabó, J., . A comparative study of six methods of shaping the root canal in vitro. . Int Endod J 1992: p.29.

Southard DW, Oswald RJ, Natkin E. Instrumentation of curved molar root canals with the roane technique. J Endod. 1987;13(10):479-89.

Nagy CD, Szabó J, Szabó J. A mathematically based classification of root canal curvatures on natural human teeth. J Endod. 1995;21(11):557-60.

Gupta SK, Saxena P. Proposal for a simple and effective diagrammatic representation of root canal configuration for better communication amongst oral radiologists and clinicians. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2016;6(1):60-6.

Weine F. Endodontic Therapy 3rd ed St. Louis: CV Mosby, 176, 2. 1982;19.

Vertucci F, Williams R. Root canal anatomy of the mandibular first molar. J N J Dent Assoc. 1974;45(3):27.

Sert S, Bayirli GS. Evaluation of the root canal configurations of the mandibular and maxillary permanent teeth by gender in the Turkish population. J Endod. 2004;30(6):391-8.

Arnold M, Ricucci D, Siqueira JF. Infection in a Complex Network of Apical Ramifications as the Cause of Persistent Apical Periodontitis: A Case Report. J Endod. 2013;39(9):1179-84.

Iqbal MK, Gartenberg J, Kratchman SI, Karabucak B, Bui B. The clinical significance and management of apical accessory canals in maxillary central incisors. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136(3):331-5.

Kim S, Kratchman S. Modern Endodontic Surgery Concepts and Practice: A Review. J Endod. 2006;32(7):601-23.

Cheung GSP, Yang J, Fan B. Morphometric study of the apical anatomy of C-shaped root canal systems in mandibular second molars. Int Endod J. 2007;40(4):239-46.

De Deus QD. Frequency, location, and direction of the lateral, secondary, and accessory canals. J Endod. 1975;1(11):361-6.

American Association of Endodontics (2016) Glossary of terms.

Al‐Qudah A, Awawdeh L. Root canal morphology of mandibular incisors in a Jordanian population. Int Endod J. 2006;39(11):873-7.

Çalişkan MK, Pehlivan Y, Sepetçioğlu F, Türkün M, Tuncer SŞ. Root canal morphology of human permanent teeth in a Turkish population. J Endod. 1995;21(4):200-4.

Green D. A stereo-binocular microscopic study of the root apices and surrounding areas of 100 mandibular molars: Preliminary study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1955;8(12):1298-304.

Yoshiuchi Y., Yokochi K. Studies on the anatomical forms of the pulp cavities with new method of vaccum inje ction,. Shika Kiso Igakkai zasshi. 1972;14(2):156-85.

Yoshida H, Yakushiji M, Sugihara A, Tanaka K, Taguchi M. [Accesory canals at floor of the pulp chamber of primary molars (author's transl)]. Shikwa Gakuho. 1975;75(3):580-5.

Versiani M.A. O-ZR. Root Canal Anatomy: Implications in Biofilm Disinfection. Springer Series on Biofilms ed. Chávez de Paz L. SC, Kishen A., editor. Berlin, Heidelberg.: Springer; 2015.

Satoru Matsunaga YS, Hideaki Kinoshita, Masashi Yamada, Akinobu Usami, Yuichi Tamatsu, Shinichi Abe. Morphologic Classification of Root Canals and Incidence of Accessory Canals in Maxillary First Molar Palatal Roots: Three-Dimensional Observation and Measurements using Micro-CT. J Hard Tissue Biol. 2014;23(3):329-34.

Ozcan G, Sekerci A, Kocoglu F. C-shaped mandibular primary first molar diagnosed with cone beam computed tomography: A novel case report and literature review of primary molars' root canal systems. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2016;34(4):397-404.

Neboda C, Anthonappa RP, King NM. Preliminary investigation of the variations in root canal morphology of hypomineralised second primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018;28(3):310-8.

Ahmed H. Anatomical challenges, electronic working length determination and current developments in root canal preparation of primary molar teeth. Int Endod J. 2013;46(11):1011-22.

El Hachem C, Kaloustian M, Nehme W, Ghosn N, Abou Chedid J. Three-dimensional modeling and measurements of root canal anatomy in second primary mandibular molars: a case series micro CT study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2019;20(5):457-65.

Reddy NV, Daneswari V, Patil R, Meghana B, Reddy A, Niharika P. Three-dimensional assessment of root canal morphology of human deciduous molars using cone beam computed tomography: An In vitro Study. Int. J. Pedod.Rehabil. 2018;3(1):36.

Rimondini L, Baroni C. Morphologic criteria for root canal treatment of primary molars undergoing resorption. Dent Traumatol. 1995;11(3):136-41.

Waterhouse PJ WJ, Camp JH, Fuks AB Pathways of the Pulp 10th ed. Hargreaves K CS, editor: St. Louis, Mosby Elsevier; 2011. 808–57 p.

Ahmed HMA, Musale PK, El Shahawy OI, Dummer PMH. Application of a new system for classifying tooth, root and canal morphology in the primary dentition. Int Endod J. 2020;53(1):27-35.

Ahmed HM, Versiani MA, De-Deus G, Dummer PM. New proposal for classifying root and root canal morphology. The Root Canal Anatomy in Permanent Dentition. 2019:47-56.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.