12- months color stability of direct resin composite veneers in anterior teeth: Clinical trial
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: This clinical trial aims to evaluate the color changes of direct resin composite veneer (DCV) restorations based on spectrophotometric analysis of 4 different types of resin composites between the baseline immediately after polishing and after one year of follow-up. Materials and methods: 28 patients were assessed for eligibility for participation, aged between 18 and 38 years old, who indicated for DCV restorations in anterior maxillary teeth were considered for participation in this study. In total, 25 patients who met the inclusion criteria were selected (6 males and 19 females, mean age: 20.9 at the time of restoration placement), and 3 patients were excluded. Participants were divided into four groups based on the type of composite resin used for restorations. Group 1 nanohybrid Ips Empress direct (Ivoclar Vivadent)](IPS) (13 restorations/6 patients), group 2 microfilled [Essentia (GC cooperation Japan)](ES) (14 restorations / 7 patients), group 3 supra-nano filled [ Estelite ∑ Quick (Tokuyama, Tokyo, Japan)](EQ) (17 restorations / 7 patients) and group 4 nanofill [Filtek Ultimate (3M ESPE)](FU) (13 restorations / 5 patients). Baseline Color measurements were performed with a spectrophotometer immediately after finishing and polishing (baseline), and after one year of recall, color change (ΔE) from baseline values and after one year of follow-up of DCVs were calculated according to CIELab color coordinates. For this, a silicone mold was fabricated for each patient and used as a guide for each measurement to standardize the site of the readings. Statistical analysis of the data was applied using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn-Bonferroni posthoc test after controlling the distribution of data in terms of normality with the Shapiro Wilk test. Results: At the end of one year,25 participants(57restorations) were followed up. The mean ΔE of IPS, EQ, and FU composites were higher than the ES composite resin, but there was no statically significant difference between all types of composites (P> 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean ΔL* between any types of composite resin (p> 0.05). There was a significant change in Δa* and Δb* after a one-year recall for all the types of DCV restorations (p < 0.05). Conclusion: After one year of follow-up, the spectrophotometer measurements of direct resin composite veneer restorations, it was concluded no difference between the mean ΔE of ES, IPS, FU, and EQ resin composite. ES (Microfilled hybrid) showed a lower mean ΔE value compared to the other groups. All groups of resin composite showed color changes within clinically acceptable levels after a one-year follow-up.
Received date: 01-05-2022
Accepted date: 20-06-2022
Downloads
Article Details
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licenses and Copyright
The following policy applies in The Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry (JBCD):
# JBCD applies the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license to articles and other works we publish. If you submit your paper for publication by JBCD, you agree to have the CC BY license applied to your work. Under this Open Access license, you as the author agree that anyone can reuse your article in whole or part for any purpose, for free, even for commercial purposes. Anyone may copy, distribute, or reuse the content as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This facilitates freedom in re-use and also ensures that JBCD content can be mined without barriers for the needs of research.
# If your manuscript contains content such as photos, images, figures, tables, audio files, videos, etc., that you or your co-authors do not own, we will require you to provide us with proof that the owner of that content (a) has given you written permission to use it, and (b) has approved of the CC BY license being applied to their content. We provide a form you can use to ask for and obtain permission from the owner. If you do not have owner permission, we will ask you to remove that content and/or replace it with other content that you own or have such permission to use.Don't assume that you can use any content you find on the Internet, or that the content is fair game just because it isn't clear who the owner is or what license applies.
# Many authors assume that if they previously published a paper through another publisher, they own the rights to that content and they can freely use that content in their paper, but that’s not necessarily the case, it depends on the license that covers the other paper. Some publishers allow free and unrestricted re-use of article content they own, such as under the CC BY license. Other publishers use licenses that allow re-use only if the same license is applied by the person or publisher re-using the content. If the paper was published under a CC BY license or another license that allows free and unrestricted use, you may use the content in your JBCD paper provided that you give proper attribution, as explained above.If the content was published under a more restrictive license, you must ascertain what rights you have under that license. At a minimum, review the license to make sure you can use the content. Contact that JBCD if you have any questions about the license. If the license does not permit you to use the content in a paper that will be covered by an unrestricted license, you must obtain written permission from the publisher to use the content in your JBCD paper. Please do not include any content in your JBCD paper which you do not have rights to use, and always give proper attribution.
# If any relevant accompanying data is submitted to repositories with stated licensing policies, the policies should not be more restrictive than CC BY.
# JBCD reserves the right to remove any photos, captures, images, figures, tables, illustrations, audio and video files, and the like, from any paper, whether before or after publication, if we have reason to believe that the content was included in your paper without permission from the owner of the content.
How to Cite
References
Strassler HE, Harvey K, Ladwig E. Dimer chemistry for anterior and posterior restorations. Inside Dent. 2009:110-113.
Christensen G. Zirconia: most durable tooth-colored crown material in practice-based clinical study. Clin Rep. 2018; 11:3-6.
Klaff M, Ward G. Composite technic for restoration of malformed teeth. Dent Surv. 1973;49(3):34-36.
LeSage BP. Aesthetic anterior composite restorations: a guide to direct placement. Dent Clin North Am. 2007;51(2):359-378.
Prieto LT, Araujo C, de Oliveira D, de Azevedo Vaz SL, D’Arce M, Paulillo L. Minimally invasive cosmetic dentistry: smile reconstruction using direct resin bonding. Gen Dent. 2014;62(1):28-31.
Coelho-de-Souza FH, Gonçalves DS, Sales MP, Erhardt MCG, Corrêa MB, Opdam NJ, Demarco FF. Direct an-terior composite veneers in vital and non-vital teeth: a retrospective clinical evaluation. J Dent. 2015;43(11):1330-1336.
Araujo E, Perdigão J. Anterior veneer restorations-an evidence-based minimal-intervention perspective. J Adhes Dent. 2021; 23:91-110.
Christensen GJ. Veneer mania. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137(8):1161-1163.
Meijering A, Snoek P, Roeters F. Patients' satisfaction with different types of veneer restorations. J. Dent. Res. 1996; 75:2896-2896.
Gürses M, Çobanoğlu N, Abdulateef OF. Comparative evaluation of the color stability of universal composites. Int. Dent. Res. 2021;11(Suppl. 1):234-237.
Micali B, Basting RT. Effectiveness of composite resin polymerization using light-emitting diodes (LEDs) or halogen-based light-curing units. Braz. Oral Res. 2004; 18:266-270.
Brook A, Smith R, Lath D. The clinical measurement of tooth colour and stain. Int. Dent. J.2007;57(5):324-330.
Ferracane J, Marker V. Solvent degradation and reduced fracture toughness in aged composites. J Dent Res. 1992;71(1):13-19.
Johnston W, Kao E. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res. 1989;68(5):819-822.
Cho B-H, Lim Y-K, Lee Y-K. Comparison of the color of natural teeth measured by a colorimeter and Shade Vision System. Dent Mater. 2007;23(10):1307-1312.
Douglas RD, Steinhauer TJ, Wee AG. Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97(4):200-208.
Sabatini C. Color stability behavior of methacrylate-based resin composites polymerized with light-emitting diodes and quartz-tungsten-halogen. Oper Dent. 2015;40(3):271-281.
Ferracane JL. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mater. 2006;22(3):211-222.
Oliveira DCRSd, Souza‐Júnior EJ, Prieto LT, Coppini EK, Maia RR, Paulillo LAMS. Color stability and polymerization behavior of direct esthetic restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014;26(4):288-295.
Lee Y-K, Powers JM. Influence of background color on the color changes of resin composites after accelerated aging. Am J Dent 2007;20(1):27.
Vichi A, Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Color and opacity variations in three different resin-based composite products after water aging. Dent Mater.2004;20(6):530-534.
Lee Y-K, Yu B, Lim H-N, Lim JI. Difference in the color stability of direct and indirect resin composites. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011;19(2):154-160.
Dietschi D, Abdelaziz M, Krejci I, Di Bella E, Ardu S. A novel evaluation method for optical integration of class IV composite restorations. Aust Dent J. 2012;57(4):446-452.
Ruyter I, Nilner K, Möller B. Color stability of dental composite resin materials for crown and bridge veneers. Dent Mater. 1987;3(5):246-251.
Kaminedi RR, Penumatsa NV, Priya T, Baroudi K. The influence of finishing/polishing time and cooling system on surface roughness and microhardness of two different types of composite resin restorations. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2014;4(Suppl 2): S99.
Aydın N, Karao˘ glano˘ glu S, Kılıçarslan MA, Oktay EA, Ersöz B. Effect of Wet and Dry Polishing Conditions by Two Finishing and Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness and Color Changes of Two Composite Resin Restoratives: An In Vitro Comparative Study. J Adv Oral Res. 2022;13(1):127-134.