In vitro assessment of bracket adhesion post enamel conditioning with a novel etchant paste
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: 37% phosphoric acid (PA) is the traditional enamel etching technique prior to bracket adhesion, yet it has been implicated in numerous enamel injuries. The purpose of the current study was to create a calcium phosphate (CaP) etching paste in a simplified capsule formula that can underpin clinically adequate bracket bond strength without jeopardizing the integrity of enamel upon the debracketing procedure. Materials and Methods: micro-sized hydroxyapatite (HA) powder was mixed with 40% PA solution to prepare experimental acidic CaP paste. Sixty human premolars were assigned into two groups of 30 each. Enamel conditioning was accomplished using 37% PA-gel for control group and CaP paste for experimental group. Each group was further divided into two subgroups regarding the water storage (WS) period (24 h and 30 days). Shear bond strength (SBS) test conducted with examination of debonded surfaces for adhesive remnants and enamel damage using a digital microscope. Results: CaP paste produced significantly lower SBS values than PA (p < 0.01), yet sufficient for clinical use. PA etching caused often cracked enamel surfaces with excessive retention of adhesive remnants (mainly ARI scores 2 and 3). Contrarily, enamel treated with the experimental CaP paste exhibited smooth, unblemished surfaces mostly clean of adhesives residues (scores 0 and 1). Conclusion: a newly developed CaP paste in a capsule formula fosters clinically adequate bracket adhesion with a sustained bonding performance, allows a harmless bracket removal with minimal or no adhesive residues on debonded surfaces; thus, it can be introduced as a suitable alternative to PA.
Received: date: 01-12-2022
Accepted: date: 10-01-2023
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licenses and Copyright
The following policy applies in The Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry (JBCD):
# JBCD applies the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license to articles and other works we publish. If you submit your paper for publication by JBCD, you agree to have the CC BY license applied to your work. Under this Open Access license, you as the author agree that anyone can reuse your article in whole or part for any purpose, for free, even for commercial purposes. Anyone may copy, distribute, or reuse the content as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This facilitates freedom in re-use and also ensures that JBCD content can be mined without barriers for the needs of research.
# If your manuscript contains content such as photos, images, figures, tables, audio files, videos, etc., that you or your co-authors do not own, we will require you to provide us with proof that the owner of that content (a) has given you written permission to use it, and (b) has approved of the CC BY license being applied to their content. We provide a form you can use to ask for and obtain permission from the owner. If you do not have owner permission, we will ask you to remove that content and/or replace it with other content that you own or have such permission to use.Don't assume that you can use any content you find on the Internet, or that the content is fair game just because it isn't clear who the owner is or what license applies.
# Many authors assume that if they previously published a paper through another publisher, they own the rights to that content and they can freely use that content in their paper, but that’s not necessarily the case, it depends on the license that covers the other paper. Some publishers allow free and unrestricted re-use of article content they own, such as under the CC BY license. Other publishers use licenses that allow re-use only if the same license is applied by the person or publisher re-using the content. If the paper was published under a CC BY license or another license that allows free and unrestricted use, you may use the content in your JBCD paper provided that you give proper attribution, as explained above.If the content was published under a more restrictive license, you must ascertain what rights you have under that license. At a minimum, review the license to make sure you can use the content. Contact that JBCD if you have any questions about the license. If the license does not permit you to use the content in a paper that will be covered by an unrestricted license, you must obtain written permission from the publisher to use the content in your JBCD paper. Please do not include any content in your JBCD paper which you do not have rights to use, and always give proper attribution.
# If any relevant accompanying data is submitted to repositories with stated licensing policies, the policies should not be more restrictive than CC BY.
# JBCD reserves the right to remove any photos, captures, images, figures, tables, illustrations, audio and video files, and the like, from any paper, whether before or after publication, if we have reason to believe that the content was included in your paper without permission from the owner of the content.
How to Cite
Publication Dates
References
Vinagre, A.R., Messias, A.L., Gomes, M.A., et al. Effect of time on shear bond strength of four orthodontic adhesive systems. Rev Port Estomatol Med. Dent. Cir. Maxilofac. 2014; 55(3): 142-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpemd.2014.08.003
Hosein, I., Sherriff, M., Ireland, A.J. Enamel loss during bonding, debonding, and cleanup with use of a self-etching primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 126(6): 717-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.10.032
Pont, H.B., Özcan, M., Bagis, B., et al. Loss of surface enamel after bracket debonding: an in-vivo and ex-vivo evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 138(4): 387-e1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.01.028
Lamper, T., Ilie, N., Huth, K.C., et al. Self-etch adhesives for the bonding of orthodontic brackets: faster, stronger, safer?. Clin. Oral Investig. 2014; 18(1): 313-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-0942-2
Janiszewska-Olszowska, J., Szatkiewicz, T., Tomkowski, R., et al. Effect of orthodontic debonding and adhesive removal on the enamel–current knowledge and future perspectives–a systematic review. Med Sci Monit. 2014; 20: 1991-2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.890912
Schlueter, N., Peutzfeldt, A., Ganss, C., et al. Does tin pre-treatment enhance the bond strength of adhesive systems to enamel?. J Dent. 2013; 41(7): 642-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.009
Türköz, Ç., Ulusoy, Ç. Evaluation of different enamel conditioning techniques for orthodontic bonding. Korean J Orthod. 2012; 42(1): 32-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2012.42.1.32
Goracci, C., Margvelashvili, M., Giovannetti, A., et al. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a new self-adhering flowable resin composite. Clin. Oral Investig. 2013; 17(2): 609-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0729-x
Fleming, P.S., Johal, A., Pandis, N. Self-etch primers and conventional acid-etch technique for orthodontic bonding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012; 142(1): 83-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.02.023
Ibrahim, A.I., Thompson, V.P., Deb, S. A Novel Etchant System for Orthodontic Bracket Bonding. Sci. Rep. 2019; 9(1): 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45980-9
Ibrahim, A.I., Al-Hasani, N.R., Thompson, V.P., et al. Resistance of bonded premolars to four artificial ageing models post enamel conditioning with a novel calcium-phosphate paste. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020; 12(4):e317–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.56764
Årtun, J., Bergland, S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod. 1984; 85(4): 333–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90190-8
Eliades, G., Eliades, T., Watts, D.C. Dental hard tissues and bonding. Springer-Verlag Berlin ʺ Heidelberg; 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28559-8
Cruz-González, A.C., Delgado-Mejía, E. Experimental study of brackets adhesion with a novel enamel-protective material compared with conventional etching. Saudi Dent J. 2020; 32(1): 36–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.05.006
Ibrahim, A.I., Al-Hasani, N.R., Thompson, V.P., et al. In vitro bond strengths post thermal and fatigue load cycling of sapphire brackets bonded with self-etch primer and evaluation of enamel damage. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020; 12(1): e22–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.56444
Boncuk, Y., Cehreli, Z.C., Polat-Özsoy, Ö. Effects of different orthodontic adhesives and resin removal techniques on enamel color alteration. Angle Orthod. 2014; 84(4): 634-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/060613-433.1
Vilchis, R.J., Yamamoto, S., Kitai, N., et al. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different self-etching adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136(3): 425-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.024
Da Rosa, W.L., Piva, E., da Silva, A.F. Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015; 43(7): 765-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.003
Erickson, R.L., Barkmeier, W.W., Latta, M.A. The role of etching in bonding to enamel: A comparison of self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 2009; 25(11): 1459–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.07.002
Abdelnaby, Y.L., Al-Wakeel, E.E. Effect of early orthodontic force on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different adhesive systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 138(2): 208-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.09.034
Cardenas, A.F., Siqueira, F.S., Bandeca, M.C., et al. Impact of pH and application time of meta-phosphoric acid on resin-enamel and resin-dentin bonding. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018; 78: 352-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.11.028
Brauchli, L., Steineck, M. Etching Patterns of Self-Etching Primers in Relation to Shear Bond Strength on Unground Enamel Samples. Dent J. 2021; 9(11): 138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/dj9110138
Finnema, K.J., Özcan, M., Post, W.J., et al. In-vitro orthodontic bond strength testing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137(5): 615-622.e3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.12.021
Eliades, T., Bourauel, C. Intraoral aging of orthodontic materials: The picture we miss and its clinical relevance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 127(4): 403–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.09.015
Oesterle, L.J., Shellhart, W.C. Effect of aging on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133(5): 716–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.042
Hong, L., Wang, Y., Wang, L., et al. Synthesis and characterization of a novel resin monomer with low viscosity. J Dent. 2017; 59: 11-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.01.006
Chen, C., Chen, Y., Lu, Z., et al. The effects of water on degradation of the zirconia-resin bond. J Dent. 2017; 64: 23-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.04.004
Yuasa, T., Iijima, M., Ito, S., et al, Mizoguchi I. Effects of long-term storage and thermocycling on bond strength of two self-etching primer adhesive systems. Eur J Orthod. 2010; 32(3): 285-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjp118
Takamizawa, T., Barkmeier, W.W., Tsujimoto, A., et al. Influence of water storage on fatigue strength of self-etch adhesives. J Dent. 2015; 43(12): 1416-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.10.018
Øgaard, B., Fjeld, M. The Enamel Surface and Bonding in Orthodontics. Semin Orthod. 2010; 16(1): 37–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2009.12.003
Bishara, S.E., Ostby, A.W., Laffoon, J., et al. Enamel cracks and ceramic bracket failure during debonding in vitro. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78(6): 1078-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/112007-540.1