Shear bond strength after various recycling processes of rebonded damon brackets: a comparative in vitro study.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: This study aims to investigate the effect of various recycling techniques on metal self-ligating Damon brackets' shear bond strength. Materials and methods: Fifty-four Damon Q self-ligating brackets in total were split into two different groups: the first group, which included the control group, had 18 new brackets, and the second group, which included 36 new brackets that were bonded to typodont and then debonded using a tweezer. Eighteen debonded brackets were split into two experimental groups for recycling (sandblasting and tungsten carbide bur). The fifty-four removed upper first premolar teeth were then fitted with all of the brackets using a uniform bonding technique. Every specimen's shear bond strength was assessed using a universal testing machine until the bond breakup. The data were statistically analyzed using the ANOVA F-test in SPSS version 26. P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant for all statistical tests. Result: Using the ANOVA F-test, it was found that there were significant differences in the mean value of the shear bond strength for each group. Moreover, the mean value of shear bond strength for the new bracket group had the highest value (5.99± 0.40 MPa), followed by the sandblasting group (5.94 ± 0.11 MPa), and the tungsten carbide bur group had the lowest value (4.27± 0.75 MPa). Conclusion: For repositioning of rebounded Damon brackets, shear bond strength that is clinically acceptable would be produced by the sandblasting procedure, while the tungsten carbide bur method would result in lower shear bonding strength and bracket base mesh loss.
Received date: 01-08-2024
Accepted date: 02-09-2024
Published date: 15-09-2025
Downloads
Article Details
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licenses and Copyright
The following policy applies in The Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry (JBCD):
# JBCD applies the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license to articles and other works we publish. If you submit your paper for publication by JBCD, you agree to have the CC BY license applied to your work. Under this Open Access license, you as the author agree that anyone can reuse your article in whole or part for any purpose, for free, even for commercial purposes. Anyone may copy, distribute, or reuse the content as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This facilitates freedom in re-use and also ensures that JBCD content can be mined without barriers for the needs of research.
# If your manuscript contains content such as photos, images, figures, tables, audio files, videos, etc., that you or your co-authors do not own, we will require you to provide us with proof that the owner of that content (a) has given you written permission to use it, and (b) has approved of the CC BY license being applied to their content. We provide a form you can use to ask for and obtain permission from the owner. If you do not have owner permission, we will ask you to remove that content and/or replace it with other content that you own or have such permission to use.Don't assume that you can use any content you find on the Internet, or that the content is fair game just because it isn't clear who the owner is or what license applies.
# Many authors assume that if they previously published a paper through another publisher, they own the rights to that content and they can freely use that content in their paper, but that’s not necessarily the case, it depends on the license that covers the other paper. Some publishers allow free and unrestricted re-use of article content they own, such as under the CC BY license. Other publishers use licenses that allow re-use only if the same license is applied by the person or publisher re-using the content. If the paper was published under a CC BY license or another license that allows free and unrestricted use, you may use the content in your JBCD paper provided that you give proper attribution, as explained above.If the content was published under a more restrictive license, you must ascertain what rights you have under that license. At a minimum, review the license to make sure you can use the content. Contact that JBCD if you have any questions about the license. If the license does not permit you to use the content in a paper that will be covered by an unrestricted license, you must obtain written permission from the publisher to use the content in your JBCD paper. Please do not include any content in your JBCD paper which you do not have rights to use, and always give proper attribution.
# If any relevant accompanying data is submitted to repositories with stated licensing policies, the policies should not be more restrictive than CC BY.
# JBCD reserves the right to remove any photos, captures, images, figures, tables, illustrations, audio and video files, and the like, from any paper, whether before or after publication, if we have reason to believe that the content was included in your paper without permission from the owner of the content.
How to Cite
References
Harradine N. Self-ligating brackets: where are we now? J of Orthod 2014; 30: 2003 – 3.
Damon D. H. The Damon low-friction bracket; a biologically compatible straight-wire system. J Clin Orthod 1998; 32: 670-680.
Nam HJ, Flores-Mir C, Major PW, Heo G, Kim J, Lagravère MO. Dental and skeletal changes associated with the Damon system philosophical approach. Int Orthod. 2019;17(4):621-33.
Saloom HF, Mohammed-Salih HS, Rasheed SF. The influence of different types of fixed orthodontic appliances on the growth and adherence of microorganisms (in vitro study). J Clin Exp Dent. 2013;5(1): e36.
Grazioli G, Hardan L, Bourgi R, Nakanishi L, Amm E, Zarow M, et al. Resid - dual adhesive removal methods for rebonding of debonded orthodontic metal brackets: systematic review and meta-analysis. Mater Basel Switz. 2021;14(20):66.
Knox J, Hubsch P, Jones ML, Middleton J. The influence of bracket base design on the strength of the bracket–cement interface. J of Orthod. 2000; 27: 249-254.
Mui B, Rossouw P, Kulkarni G. Optimization of a procedure for rebonding dislodged orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 1999;69:276-281.
Lunardi N, Gameiro GH, De Araújo Magnani MBB, Nouer DF, De Siqueira VCV, Consani S, et al. The effect of repeated bracket recycling on the shear bond strength of different orthodontic adhesives. Braz J Oral Sci 2008;7:1648-1652.
El-Bokle D, Ahmed F. Bracket positioning in orthodontics: Past and present. AJO-DO Clinical Companion. 2023;3(2):77-84.
Hussein AM, Mohammed-Salih HS, Al-Sheakli II. Effects of various cleaning agents on polypropylene and copolyester thermoplastic orthodontic retainer materials. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2022;17(5):861-868.
Linjawi AI, Abushal AM, Al-Zahrani AM, Bakhamis BA. Patients’ perceptions to reduced orthodontic treatment time in Saudi Arabia. Patient preference adherence. 2019 :1973-81.
Sedky Y, AbdelHamid MB. Evaluating the efficiency of Er, Cr: YSGG laser for recycling of debonded stainless steel orthodontic brackets: an in vitro study. Lasers dent. sci. 2021;5(3):185-91.
Ahmed ZA, Al-Khatieeb MM. A Comparison of Shear Bond Strength Values of Recycled Self-Ligating Ceramic Brackets with New Ones (An-in Vitro Study). Indian J Med Forensic Med Toxicol. 2021;15(3):1673-9.
Yassaei S, Aghili H, KhanPayeh E, Goldani Moghadam M. Comparison of shear bond strength of rebonded brackets with four methods of adhesive removal. Lasers Med Sci. 2014; 29: 1563-1568.
Mohammed-Salih HS, Saloom HF. Collection, storage and protein extraction method of gingival crevicular fluid for proteomic analysis. J. Bagh. Coll. Dent. 2022 Apr 1;19(2):0368.
Bahnasi FI, Abd-Rahman AN, Abu-Hassan MI. Effects of recycling and bonding agent application on bond strength of stainless steel orthodontic brackets. J Clin Exp Dent y, 2013;5: e197.
Bahnasi FI, Abd Rahman AN, Abu-Hassan MI. The impact of recycling and repeated recycling on shear bond strength of stainless steel orthodontic brackets. orthodontic waves. 2013;72(1):16-22.
Hatf AD, Al-Khatieeb MM. Effect of ageing media on shear bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets bonded with different adhesive systems (A comparative in-vitro study). J Bagh Coll Dent. 2020;32(4):5-11.
Thamer AK, Abood AN. Preparation and in vitro Characterization of Aceclofenac Nanosuspension (ACNS) for Enhancement of Percutaneous Absorption using Hydrogel Dosage Form. Iraqi J Pharm.Sci. 2021;30(2):86-98.
Randomization Plan generator. https://www.cd-clintrial.com/randomization-plan-design/
Abduljawad A, Mohammed-Salih H, Jabir M, Almahdy A. The Effectiveness of a 10-Methacryloyloxydecyl Dihydrogen Phosphate (10-MDP)-Containing Hydrophilic Primer on Orthodontic Molar Tubes Bonded under Moisture Contamination: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Coatings. 2023;13(9):1635.
Chung C.-H, Friedman S D, Mante FK. Shear bond strength of rebonded mechanically retentive ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002; 122: 282-287.
Ahmadizenouz G, Esmaeili B, Taghvaei A, Jamali Z, Jafari T, Daneshvar FA, et al. Effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of nanofilled composite repairs J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2016; 10:916.
Yassaei S Aghili H, Firouzabadi AH, Meshkani H. Effect of Er: YAG laser and sandblasting in recycling of ceramic brackets. J Lasers Med Sci 2017., 8(1), 17.
Tavares SW, Consani S, Nouer DF, Magnani MBBA, Neto JSP, Romano FL. Evaluation in vitro of the shear bond strength of aluminium oxide recycled brackets. Braz J Oral Sci. 2003;2:378-381.
Reynolds I, Von Fraunhofer J. Direct bonding of orthodontic attachments to teeth: the relation of adhesive bond strength to gauze mesh size. Br J Orthod. 1976; 3: 91-95.
Sonis AL. Air abrasion of failed bonded metal brackets: a study of shear bond strength and surface characteristics as determined by scanning electron microscopy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110: 96-98.
Kachoei M, Mohammadi A, Esmaili Moghaddam M, Rikhtegaran S, Pourghaznein M, Shirazi S. Comparison of Multiple Rebond Shear Strengths of Debonded Brackets after Preparation with Sandblasting and CO2 Laser. J Dent Res Dent Clin. Dent. Prospects. 2016;10:148–154.
Basudan AM, Al-Emran SE. The effects of in-office reconditioning on the morphology of slots and bases of stainless steel brackets and on the shear/peel bond strength. J Orthod. 2014; 231 -236.
Chacko PK, Kodoth J, John J, Kumar K. Recycling stainless steel orthodontic brackets with Er: YAG laser-An environmental scanning electron microscope and shear bond strength study. J Orthod Sci 2013; 2: 87-97. DOI:
Hasan SF, Abood AZ. Effect of Various Particle Size of Sand-blast on Roughness and Shear Bond Strength of Ips E. max Press With Ceramic Veneer Materials (An in Vitro Study). Malaysian J. Med. Health. 2022; 18.
Uehara K, Sakurai M. Bonding strength of adhesives and surface roughness of joined parts. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2002; 127(2):178-81.
Uo M, Sjögren G, Sundh A, Goto M, Watari F, Bergman M. Effect of surface condition of dental zirconia ceramic (Denzir) on bonding. Dent Mater J. 2006;25(3):626-31.