Effect of a novel coating material on the microleakage of glass hybrid restoration in primary teeth – An in vitro study

Main Article Content

Halah Abdulkareem A. Alkhawaja
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7940-3272
Aseel Haidar M.J. Al Haidar
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4936-4927

Abstract

Background: Glass ionomer restorations are widely employed in the field of pediatric dentistry. There is a constant demand for a durable restoration that remains functional until exfoliation. This study aimed to measure and compare the effect of a novel coating material (EQUIA Forte Coat) on the microleakage of glass hybrid restoration (EQUIA Forte HT) in primary teeth. Material and method: Thirty cavitated (class-II) primary molars were allocated randomly into two groups based on the coat application; uncoated (control) and coated group (experimental). Cavities were prepared by the use of a ceramic bur (CeraBur) and restored with EQUIA Forte HT with or without applying a protective coat (EQUIA Forte Coat). Samples went through the thermocycling process and dipped in 2% methylene blue dye before being sectioned through the center of the restoration. Microleakage was evaluated digitally using software and a camera connected to a stereomicroscope (30 x magnification) to assess dye penetration of the sectioned samples at both the occlusal and gingival marginal levels. Results: There was a significant difference between the coated and uncoated groups at both occlusal (p=.029) and gingival margin sites (p=.001). Conclusion: Higher microleakage values were associated with the uncoated group compared to the coated one. The application of a protective coating to the restorations is an efficient approach to decrease the microleakage of the restorations that can be usefully adopted in clinical practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Research Articles

Author Biographies

Halah Abdulkareem A. Alkhawaja , Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Iraq

Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Iraq

Aseel Haidar M.J. Al Haidar, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Iraq

Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Iraq

How to Cite

1.
Alkhawaja HAA, Al Haidar AHM. Effect of a novel coating material on the microleakage of glass hybrid restoration in primary teeth – An in vitro study. J Bagh Coll Dent [Internet]. 2023 Mar. 15 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];35(1):20-6. Available from: https://jbcd.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/jbcd/article/view/3311

References

Duangthip, D., Chu, C.H. Challenges in oral hygiene and oral health policy. Front Oral Health. 2020; 1: 575428.

Kazeminia, M., Abdi, A., Shohaimi, S., et al. Dental caries in primary and permanent teeth in children’s worldwide, 1995 to 2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Head Face Med. 2020; 16(1):1-21.

Gaintantzopoulou, M.D., Gopinath, V.K., Zinelis, S. Evaluation of cavity wall adaptation of bulk esthetic materials to restore class II cavities in primary molars. Clin Oral Investig. 2017; 21(4): 1063-70.

Ardeshana, A., Bargale, S., Karri, A., et al. Evaluation of Caries Excavation Efficacy with Ceramic Bur and Hand Excavation in Primary Teeth: An Experimental Study. J. South Asian Assoc Pediatric Dent. 2020; 3: 60-64.

Ali, A.S., EL-Malt, M.A., Mohamed, E.A. A Comparative Evaluation of EQUIA Forte Microleakage Versus Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer. Al-Azhar Dent J Girls. 2019; 6(3): 249-54.

Sharafeddin, F., Shoale, S., Kowkabi, M. Effects of different percentages of microhydroxyapatite on microhardness of res-in-modified glass-ionomer and zirconomer. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017; (6): e805.

Wiegand, A., Buchalla, W., Attin, T. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials—fluoride release and uptake char-acteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater. 2007; 23(3): 343-62.

Ilie, N., Hickel, R., Valceanu, A.S., et al. Fracture toughness of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2012; 16(2):489-98.

Brkanović, S., Ivanišević, A., Miletić, I., et al. Effect of Nano-Filled Protective Coating and Different pH Enviroment on Wear Resistance of New Glass Hybrid Restorative Material. Materials (Basel). 2021; 14(4): 755.

Jia, S., Chen, D., Wang, D., et al. Comparing marginal microleakage of three different dental materials in veneer restoration using a stereomicroscope: an in vitro study. Br Dent J. 2017; 3(1):1-5.

Fathy, D., El-Tekeya, M., Bakry, N.S., et al. Microleakage evaluation of composite restoration following caries removal using ceramic bur in primary teeth (an in vitro study). Alex Dent J. 2021; 46: 169-73.

Kitsahawong, K., Seminario, A.L., Pungchanchaikul, P., et al. Chemomechanical versus drilling methods for caries removal: an in vitro study. Braz Oral Res. 2015; 29: 1-8.

Majeed, M.A. Microleakage evaluation of a silorane-based and methacrylate-based packable and nanofill posterior compo-sites (in vitro comparative study). Tikrit J Dent Sci. 2012; 1(2): 19-26.

Ali, A.H., Thani, F.B., Foschi, F., et al. Self-limiting versus rotary subjective carious tissue removal: A randomized controlled clinical trial—2-year results. J Clin Med 2020; 9: 2738.

Daub, J., Berzins, D.W., Linn, B.J., et al. Bond strength of direct and indirect bonded brackets after thermocycling. Angle Orthod. 2006; 76(2): 295-300.

Donmez, N., Siso, S.H., Usumez, A. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in class V cavities etched by Er: YAG laser with different pulse modes. J Laser Health Acad. 2013; 1: 6-10.

Sooraparaju, S.G., Kanumuru, P.K., Nujella, S.K., et al. A comparative evaluation of microleakage in class v composite res-torations. Int J Dent 2014; 2014: 685643.

Dhingra, V., Taneja, S., Kumar, M., et al. Influence of fiber inserts, type of composite, and gingival margin location on the microleakage in Class II resin composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2014; 39: E9-E15.

Habib, S.I., Yassen, A.A., Bayoumi, RE. Influence of Nanocoats on the Physicomechanical Properties and Microleakage of Bulk-fill and Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cements: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021; 22(1): 62-8.

Hafez, M.A., Elkateb, M., El Shabrawy, S., et al. Microleakage evaluation of composite restorations following papain-based chemo-mechanical caries removal in primary teeth. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2017; 41: 53-61.

Sharafeddin, F., Yousefi, H., Modiri, S., et al. Microleakage of Posterior Composite Restorations with Fiber Inserts Using two Adhesives after ging. J Dent (Shiraz) 2013; 14: 90-5.

American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry reference manual. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, 2008.

Vishnurekha C, Annamalai S, Baghkomeh P.N, et al. Effect of protective coating on microleakage of conventional glass ionomer cement and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in primary molars: An In vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2018; 29(6): 744-748.

Mousavinenasab, S.M., Jafary, M. Microleakage of composite restorations following chemo-mechanical and conventional caries removal. Front Dent. 2004: 1(4): 12-7.

Valeri, A. In Vitro Wear of Glass-Ionomer Containing Restorative Materials: (Doctoral dissertation, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill). 2021.

Kielbassa, A.M., Oehme, E.P., Shakavets, N., et al. In vitro wear of (resin-coated) high-viscosity glass ionomer cements and glass hybrid restorative systems. J Dent. 2021; 105: 103554.

Basso, M., Brambilla, E., Benites, M.G., et al. Glassionomer cement for permanent dental restorations: a 48-months, mul-ti-centre, prospective clinical trial. Stoma Edu J. 2015; 2(1): 25-35.

Gopinath, V.K. Comparative evaluation of microleakage between bulk esthetic materials versus resin-modified glass iono-mer to restore Class II cavities in primary molars. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2017; 35(3): 238.

Alwan, S.Q., Al-Waheb, A.M. Effect of Nano-Coating on Microleakage of Different Capsulated Glass Ionomer Restoration in Primary Teeth: An In Vitro Study. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2021; 15(4): 2674-2684.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.