Molar tubes and failure rates–A review
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: To review the failure rates of molar tubes and the effect of molar tube base design, adhesive type, and bonding technique on the failure rates of molar tubes. Data: The revolution of molar bonding greatly impacted fixed orthodontic appliance treatment by reducing chair-side time and improving patient comfort. Even with the many advantages of molar bonding, clinicians sometimes hesitate to use molar tubes due to their failure rates. Sources: Internet sources, such as Pubmed and Google Scholar. Study selection: studies testing the bond failure rate of molar tubes. Conclusions: The failure rate of the molar tubes can be reduced and the bond strength of the molar tubes can be improved by changing the design of the molar tube base, the adhesive type, and the bonding technique
Received date: 01-03-2023
Accepted date: 06-04-2023
Published date: 15-06-2023
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licenses and Copyright
The following policy applies in The Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry (JBCD):
# JBCD applies the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license to articles and other works we publish. If you submit your paper for publication by JBCD, you agree to have the CC BY license applied to your work. Under this Open Access license, you as the author agree that anyone can reuse your article in whole or part for any purpose, for free, even for commercial purposes. Anyone may copy, distribute, or reuse the content as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This facilitates freedom in re-use and also ensures that JBCD content can be mined without barriers for the needs of research.
# If your manuscript contains content such as photos, images, figures, tables, audio files, videos, etc., that you or your co-authors do not own, we will require you to provide us with proof that the owner of that content (a) has given you written permission to use it, and (b) has approved of the CC BY license being applied to their content. We provide a form you can use to ask for and obtain permission from the owner. If you do not have owner permission, we will ask you to remove that content and/or replace it with other content that you own or have such permission to use.Don't assume that you can use any content you find on the Internet, or that the content is fair game just because it isn't clear who the owner is or what license applies.
# Many authors assume that if they previously published a paper through another publisher, they own the rights to that content and they can freely use that content in their paper, but that’s not necessarily the case, it depends on the license that covers the other paper. Some publishers allow free and unrestricted re-use of article content they own, such as under the CC BY license. Other publishers use licenses that allow re-use only if the same license is applied by the person or publisher re-using the content. If the paper was published under a CC BY license or another license that allows free and unrestricted use, you may use the content in your JBCD paper provided that you give proper attribution, as explained above.If the content was published under a more restrictive license, you must ascertain what rights you have under that license. At a minimum, review the license to make sure you can use the content. Contact that JBCD if you have any questions about the license. If the license does not permit you to use the content in a paper that will be covered by an unrestricted license, you must obtain written permission from the publisher to use the content in your JBCD paper. Please do not include any content in your JBCD paper which you do not have rights to use, and always give proper attribution.
# If any relevant accompanying data is submitted to repositories with stated licensing policies, the policies should not be more restrictive than CC BY.
# JBCD reserves the right to remove any photos, captures, images, figures, tables, illustrations, audio and video files, and the like, from any paper, whether before or after publication, if we have reason to believe that the content was included in your paper without permission from the owner of the content.
How to Cite
Publication Dates
References
Al-Zubaidi, HJ., Alhuwaizi, AF. Molar buccal tubes front and back openings dimensions and torsional play. J Bagh Coll Dent. 2018; 30(3): 32-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26477/jbcd.v30i3.2529
Singh, G. Textbook of Orthodontics. Second ed., Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, New Delhi, 2007.
GH Orthodontics Product Catalog (2020). Printed in USA.
Ortho Technology Product Catalog (2021). Printed in USA.
Zachrisson, BJ. A posttreatment evaluation of direct bonding in orthodontics. Am J Orthod. 1977; 71(2): 173-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(77)90394-3
Banks, P., Macfarlane, TV. Bonded versus banded first molar attachments: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Orthod. 2007; 34(2): 128-136; discussion 111-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/146531207225022032
Flores-Mir, C. Bonded molar tubes associated with higher failure rate than molar bands. Evid Based Dent. 2011; 12(3): 84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400813
Oeiras, VJ., Silva, VA., Azevedo, LA., Lobato, VS., Normando, D. Survival analysis of banding and bonding molar tubes in adult patients over a 12-month period: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Braz Oral Res. 2016; 30(1): e136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2016.vol30.0136
Beemer, RL., Ferracane, JL., Howard, HE. Orthodontic band retention on primary molar stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent. 1993; 15(6): 408-413.
Gupta, R., Mahanta, S. Assessment of failure rates between cemented molar bands and bondable molar tubes during the complete orthodontic treatment. J Nepal Dent. Assoc. 2018; 18(1): 13-16.
Paschos, E., Kurochkina, N., Huth, KC., Hansson, CS., Rudzki-Janson, I. Failure rate of brackets bonded with antimicrobial and fluoride-releasing, self-etching primer and the effect on prevention of enamel demineralization. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135(5): 613-620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.01.016
Nascimento, AÉVE., Bramante, FS., Pinzan-Vercelino, CR., Pinzan, A., Gurgel, JA. Resin reinforcement: an alternative ap-proach for direct bonding of molar tubes. J Clin Orthod. 2014; 48(7): 436-440.
Zachrisson, BU. Cause and prevention of injuries to teeth and supporting structures during orthodontic treatment. Am J Or-thod. 1976; 69(3): 285-300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(76)90077-4
Boyd, RL., Baumrind, S. Periodontal considerations in the use of bonds or bands on molars in adolescents and adults. Angle Orthod. 1992; 62(2): 117-126.
Pinzan-Vercelino, CR., Pinzan, A., Gurgel, JA., Bramante, FS., Pinzan, LM. In-vitro evaluation of an alternative method to bond molar tubes. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011; 19(1): 41-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000100009
Corbacho de Melo, MM., Cardoso, MG., Faber, J., Sobral, A. Risk factors for periodontal changes in adult patients with banded second molars during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2012; 82(2): 224-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/030911-172.1
Jardim, AFV., Azevedo, MN., Souza, JB., Freitas, JC, Estrela, C. Evaluation of bond strength of molar orthodontic tubes sub-jected to reinforcement with flowable and bonding resins. J Orofac Orthop. 2020; 81(5): 350-359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-020-00235-5
Millett, DT., Hallgren, A., Cattanach, D., McFadzean, R., Pattison, J., Robertson, M., et al. A 5-year clinical review of bond failure with a light-cured resin adhesive. Angle Orthod. 1998; 68(4): 351-356.
Nazir, M., Walsh, T., Mandall, NA., Matthew, S., Fox, D. Banding versus bonding of first permanent molars: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial. J Orthod. 2011; 38(2): 81-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/14653121141308
Abbing, A., Koretsi, V., Eliades, T., Papageorgiou, SN. Duration of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances in adolescents and adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Prog Orthod. 2020; 21(1): 37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-020-00334-4
Al-Attar, AM., Al-Shaham, S., Abid, M. Perception of Iraqi Orthodontists and Patients toward Accelerated Orthodontics. Int J Dent. 2021; 2021:5512455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5512455
Artun, J., Brobakken, BO. Prevalence of carious white spots after orthodontic treatment with multi-bonded appliances. Eur J Orthod. 1986; 8(4): 229-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/8.4.229
Al-Musallam, TA., Evans, CA., Drummond, JL., Matasa, C., Wu, CD. Anti-microbial properties of an orthodontic adhesive combined with cetylpyridinium chloride. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129(2): 245-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.015
Hailan, SY., Al-Khatieeb, MM. The effects of incorporating some additives on shear bond strength of orthodontic adhesive (an in-vitro study). Int J Med Res Health Sci. 2018; 7(11): 11-18.
Gillgrass, TJ., Benington, PC., Millett, DT., Newell, J., Gilmour, WH. Modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation? A comparative clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001; 120(1): 49-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.115035
Clark, JR., Ireland, AJ., Sherriff, M. An in-vivo and ex-vivo study to evaluate the use of a glass polyphosphonate cement in orthodontic banding. Eur J Orthod. 2003; 25(3): 319-323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/25.3.319
Geiger, AM., Gorelick, J., Gwinnett, AJ. Bond failure rates of facial and lingual attachments. J Clin Orthod. 1983; 17(3): 165-169.
Knoll, M., Gwinnett, AJ., Wolff, MS. Shear strength of brackets bonded to anterior and posterior teeth. Am J Orthod. 1986; 89(6): 476-479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(86)90003-5
Millett, DT., Letters, S., Roger, E., Cummings, A., Love, J. Bonded molar tubes - an in-vitro evaluation. Angle Orthod. 2001; 71(5): 380-385.
Evans, LB., Powers, JM. Factors affecting in-vitro bond strength of no-mix orthodontic cements. Am J Orthod. 1985; 87(6): 508-512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(85)90087-9
Johnston, CD., Hussey, DL., Burden, DJ. The effect of etch duration on the microstructure of molar enamel: an in-vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996; 109(5): 531-534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70138-5
Mattick, CR., Hobson, RS. A comparative micro-topographic study of the buccal enamel of different tooth types. J Orthod. 2000; 27(2): 143-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ortho/27.2.143
Millett, DT., Cattanach, D., McFadzean, R., Pattison, J., McColl, J. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding. Angle Orthod. 1999; 69(1): 58-63.
Pandis, N., Christensen, L., Eliades, T. Long-term clinical failure rate of molar tubes bonded with a self-etching primer. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75(6): 1000-1002.
Jung, MH. Survival analysis of brackets and tubes: A twelve-month assessment. Angle Orthod. 2014; 84(6): 1034-1040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/122613-946.1
Cucu, M., Driessen, CH., Ferreira, PD. The influence of orthodontic bracket base diameter and mesh size on bond strength. S Afr Dent J. 2002; 57(1): 16-20.
Wang, WN., Li, CH., Chou, TH., Wang, DD., Lin, LH., Lin, CT. Bond strength of various bracket base designs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 125(1): 65-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.01.003
Cozza, P., Martucci, L., De Toffol, L., Penco, SI. Shear bond strength of metal brackets on enamel. Angle Orthod. 2006; 76(5): 851-856.
Thapa, VB., Shrestha, A., Sherchan, P., Poudel, P., Joshi, L. Comparison of shear bond strength of two commercially available bondable molar tubes. Orthod J Nepal. 2019; 9(1): 11-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/ojn.v9i1.25683
Sorel, O., El-Alam, R., Chagneau, F., Cathelineau, G. Comparison of bond strength between simple foil mesh and la-ser-structured base retention brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002; 122(3): 260-266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.125834
MacColl, GA., Rossouw, PE., Titley, KC., Yamin, C. The relationship between bond strength and orthodontic bracket base surface area with conventional and microetched foil-mesh bases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998; 113(3): 276-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70297-5
Talpur, M., Cunningham, SJ., Moles, DR., Jones, SP. The relationship between base dimensions, force to failure, and shear bond strengths of bondable molar tubes. Angle Orthod. 2012; 82(3): 536-540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/060311-366.1
Meng, CL., Li, CH., Wang, WN. Bond strength with APF applied after acid etching. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998; 114: 510-513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(98)70170-2
Sorel, O., El-Alam, R., Chagneau, F., Cathelineau, G. Changes in the enamel after in-vitro debonding of brackets bonded with a modified glass ionomer cement. Orthod Fr. 2000; 71: 155-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/orthodfr/200071155
Hasan, GM., Al-Dabagh, DJN. Assessment of enamel surface after debonding of different types of esthetic brackets (an in-vitro study). J Bagh Coll Dent. 2016; 28(4): 162-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12816/0033230
Millett, DT., Mandall, NA., Mattick, RC., Hickman, J., Glenny, AM. Adhesives for bonded molar tubes during fixed brace treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 2(2): CD008236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008236.pub3
Norevall, LI., Marcusson, A., Persson, M. A clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer cement as an orthodontic bonding adhesive compared with an acrylic resin. Eur J Orthod. 1996; 18(4): 373-384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/18.4.373
Mandall, N.A., Millett, D.T., Mattick, C.R., Hickman, J., Worthington, H.V., Macfarlane, T.V. Orthodontic adhesives: a sys-tematic review. J Orthod. 2002; 29(3): 205-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ortho/29.3.205
Mandall, NA., Millett, DT., Mattick, CR., Hickman, J., Macfarlane, T.V., Worthington, H.V. Adhesives for fixed orthodontic brackets. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 4(4): CD002282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002282.pub2
Millett, DT., McCluskey, LA., McAuley, F., Creanor, SL., Newell, J., Love, J. A comparative clinical trial of a compomer and a resin adhesive for orthodontic bonding. Angle Orthod. 2000; 70(3): 233-240.
Aljubouri, YD., Millett, DT., Gilmour, WH. Six and 12 months' evaluation of a self-etching primer versus two-stage etch and prime for orthodontic bonding: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Orthod. 2004; 26(6): 565-571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/26.6.565
Banks, P., Thiruvenkatachari, B. Long-term clinical evaluation of bracket failure with a self-etching primer: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthod. 2007; 34(4): 243-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/146531207225022293
Tanbakuchi, B., Hooshmand, T., Javad Kharazifard, M., Shekofteh, K., Hesam Arefi, A. Shear bond strength of molar tubes to enamel using an orthodontic resin-modified glass ionomer cement modified with amorphous calcium phosphate. Front Dent. 2019; 16(5): 369-378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v16i5.2286
Griffin, J., Ruddy, M., Mavreas, D., Nace, S., Vande Vannet, B., Stanton, K.T. Comparison of shear bond strength and ARI of four different adhesive systems used to bond molar tubes: An in-vitro study. Int Orthod. 2021; 19(1): 117-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2020.11.001
Johnston, CD., McSherry, PF. The effects of sandblasting on the bond strength of molar attachments - an in-vitro study. Eur J Orthod. 1999; 21(3): 311-317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/21.3.311
Abu-Alhaija, E., Jaradat, M., Alwahadni, A. An Ex-vivo Shear and tensile bond strengths of orthodontic molar tubes bonded using different techniques. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017; 9(3): e448-e453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.53545
Ganiger, C., Agarwal, N., Pawar, R., Phaphe, S., Ahammed, Y., Mane, P., et al. To evaluate the shear bond strength of bondable molar tubes by two enamel conditioning techniques. J Evolution Med Dent Sci. 2020; 9(35), 2507-2510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2020/545