The clinical effectiveness assessment of proposed digital dental planning and digital smile prototypes design

Main Article Content

Rawan M Jameel
Lesovik V Stanislavovich

Abstract

Background: Modern technologies in dentistry are one of the effective methods to obtain results that are acceptable to the ‎‎patient, as well as reducing time, effort, and ‏‎‎cost. Materials and Methods: The effectiveness of the developed digital dental treatment ‎‎‏planning was evaluated by assessing the results of a survey of 50 patients in need of ‎‎‎dental ‏‎implant prosthesis for aesthetic ‎‏faults ‎‎‎of the anterior tееth at the prototype stage. The Oral ‏‎‎Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) was created to measure the impact that oral health issues can have on a person's life. ‎‎Results: after the mockup the relative occlusal load distribution ‏‎between the right and left sides was 50.40 ± 0.90% with balanced ‏‎occlusion.The dental closing time was 0.17± 0.07 s; and the dental opening time was 0.19 ±0.04 s. The difference in timing between the left and right latеrntrusions is -0.030 ‎‎± 0.03. During protrusion, the ‎‎opening time was less than 0.6 s. (0.170 ± 0.07).‎‎ ‎‎ The time required to close the teeth to reach the maximum intercuspation was 0.20 ± 0.02 s, where the time required to open them was ‎‎0.170 ± 0.02 s. Conclusion: Prior to the mock-up, the patients' average relative occlusal load distribution was 51.5±1.20% on the left and right sides. After the mock-up, it was found that the relative occlusal load distribution between the left and right sides was 50.40±0.90%. These results point to stable and successful occlusal balance restoration following mock-up. After using the OHIP-14 questionnaire to summarize the survey results, we can say that patients' quality of life has enhanced by a factor of two. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Research Articles

Author Biographies

Rawan M Jameel, College of Medicine, Belgorod State National Research University, Belgorod, Russian Federation

College of Medicine, Belgorod State National Research University, Belgorod, Russian Federation

Lesovik V Stanislavovich, Department of Materials Science, Products and Structures, Belgorod State Technological University named after V.G. Shoukhov, Belgorod, Russian Federation,

Department of Materials Science, Products and Structures, Belgorod State Technological University named after V.G. Shoukhov, Belgorod, Russian Federation,

How to Cite

1.
Jameel RM, Stanislavovich LV. The clinical effectiveness assessment of proposed digital dental planning and digital smile prototypes design. J Bagh Coll Dent [Internet]. 2025 Sep. 15 [cited 2025 Sep. 15];37(3):90-9. Available from: https://jbcd.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/jbcd/article/view/4028

References

Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J. 2008; 204, 505–511.

Torabi K, Farjood E, Hamedani S. Rapid Prototyping Technologies and their Applications in Prosthodontics, a Review of Literature. J Dent (Shiraz). 2015 Mar;16(1):1-9.

Khdeir RM, Ibraheem AF. The Marginal Fitness of CAD/CAM All Ceramic Crowns Constructed by Two Typesof Direct Digitization Techniques (An In Vitro Study). J Bagh Coll Dent. 2016 Jun. 15;28(2):30-3.

Cattoni F, Mastrangelo F, Gherlone EF, Gastaldi G. A New Total Digital Smile Planning Technique (3D-DSP) to Fabricate CAD-CAM Mockups for Esthetic Crowns and Veneers. Int J Dent. 2016; 2016:6282587.

AlSamarrai FF, AlSheakli II. Validity of Digital and Rapid Prototyped Orthodontic Study Models. J Bagh Coll Dent. 2017; 15;29(3):79-84.

Rakhshan V, Sforza C, Vucinic P, Vitalariu AM, De Menezes, M. Advanced digital dentistry. Int J Dent. 2018; 2018, 1–2.

Rekow ED. Digital dentistry: The new state of the art - Is it disruptive or destructive?. Dent Mater. 2020; 36(1):9-24.

Camcı H, Salmanpour F. A new technique for testing accuracy and sensitivity of digital bite registration: A prospective comparative study. Int Orthod. 2021;19(3):425-432.

Alharkan H. Integrating Digital Smile Design into Restorative Dentistry: A Narrative Review of the Applications and Benefits. Saudi Dent J. 2023;10 (12).014.

Yue Z, Luo Z, Hou J, Zhang H.Application of 3D digital smile design based on virtual articulation analysis in esthetic dentistry: A technique. J Prosth Dent. 2023; S0022-3913(23) 00763-1.

Haidar ZS. Digital dentistry: Past, present, and future. Digit Med Healthc Technol. 2023.

Fatalla AA, Arzani S, Veseli E, Khademi A, Khandan A, Fahmy MD, et al. Revolutionizing Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Evidence Synthesis. Dent Hypoth. 2023;14(4):93-4.

Schierz O, Hirsch C, Krey KF, Ganss C, Kämmerer PW, Schlenz MA. Digital Dentistry and its Impact on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life. J Evidence-Based Dent Prac. 2023;15:101946.

Campos LA, Peltomäki T, Marôco J, Campos JA. Use of oral health impact profile-14 (OHIP-14) in different contexts. What is being measured?. Inter J Environ Res Pub Health. 2021 Dec 20;18(24):13412..

Omara M, Salzberger T, Boecker M, Bekes K, Steiner G, Nell-Duxneuner V, et al. Improving the measurement of oral health-related quality of life: Rasch model of the oral health impact profile-14. J Dent. 2021;114:103819.

Ingleshwar A, John MT. Cross-cultural adaptations of the oral health impact profile–An assessment of global availability of 4-dimensional oral health impact characterization. J Evidence-Based Dent Prac. 2023;23(1):101787.

John MT, Omara M, Su N, List T, Sekulic S, Häggman-Henrikson B, et al. Recommendations for use and scoring of oral health impact profile versions. J Evidence-Based Dent Prac. 2022;22(1):101619..

Joaqui OG, García RS, Pacheco JA. A three-dimensional Oral health-related quality of life framework for temporomandibular joint disorders: A structural analysis of the Oral Health Impact Profile-14. J Dent. 2023;134:104527.

Javaid M, Haleem A, Kumar L. Current status and applications of 3D scanning in dentistry. Clin Epidemio Global Health. 2019;7(2):228-33.

Falih MY, Majeed MA. Trueness and precision of eight intraoral scanners with different finishing line designs: A comparative in vitro study. Euro J Dent 2023;17(04):1056-64.

Frąckiewicz W, Jankowska A, Machoy ME. CBCT and modern intraoral scanners as tools for developing comprehensive, interdisciplinary treatment plans. Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine: Official Organ Wroclaw Medical University. 2024.

Schierz O, Hirsch C, Krey KF, Ganss C, Kämmerer PW, Schlenz MA. Digital Dentistry and its Impact on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life. J Evidence-Based Dent Prac 2023;15:101946..

De Bruyn H, Raes S, Matthys C, Cosyn J. The current use of patient‐centered/reported outcomes in implant dentistry: a systematic review. Clinic Oral Imp Res 2015;26:45-56.

Afrashtehfar KI, Assery MK, Bryant SR. Patient satisfaction in medicine and dentistry. Inter J Dent 2020;2020.

Hong G, Hung CC, Mayanagi G, Nishioka T, Sun L, Lai EH, et al. Questionnaire survey on the satisfaction of SimEx dental education system. J Dent Sci 2023;18(2):840-7..

Gredes T, Pricop-Jeckstadt M, Mereti E, Botzenhart U. Survey of student attitudes toward digital technology in practical technical dental education using the AR-Demonstrator-App. J Dent Educ. 2022; 86: 12–20.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.