Dental Aerosol Hazard Prevention with Pre-procedural Antiseptic Mouthwashes (Comparative Study)

Main Article Content

Wasnaa M Hameed
Nada J Radhi

Abstract

Background: One of the recommended methods for reducing aerosol contamination during the daily regular usage of high-speed turbine and ultrasonic scaling is the use of preprocedural mouth rinse. Several agents have been investigated as a preprocedural mouth rinse. Chlorhexidine significantly reduce the viable microbial content of aerosol when used as a preprocedural rinse. Studies have shown that cetylpridinum chloride (CPC) mouthwash is equally effective as chlorhexidine in reducing plaque and gingivitis. This study compared the effect of 0.07% CPC to 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) as preprocedural mouth rinses in reducing the aerosol contamination by high-speed turbine. Materials and Methods: 36 patients were divided into three groups based on the preprocedural rinse used (0.2% CHX, 0.07% CPC and distilled water). Conservative treatment was done for 20 min. (10 min before rinsing and 10 min after rinsing) in the same closed operatory for all the patients after keeping blood agar plates opened at three standardized locations (patient chest, dentist chest and at 12-inch from patient mouth). Colony forming units (CFUs) on blood agar plates were counted, after incubation at 37°C for 48 hr. Statistical analysis was done with (SPSS version 21(. Results: This study showed that the two antiseptic mouthwashes significantly reduced the bacterial colony forming units (CFUs) in aerosol samples at three plates locations. Chlorhexidine rinses were found to be superior to cetylpridinum chloride when used pre-procedurally in reducing aerolized bacteria. The number of CFUs were higher at the patient’s chest location as compared to other locations. Conclusion: 0.07% CPC and 0.2% CHX were effective as a pre-procedural rinse in reducing CFU count during dental treatment using high-speed turbine.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Hameed WM, Radhi NJ. Dental Aerosol Hazard Prevention with Pre-procedural Antiseptic Mouthwashes (Comparative Study). J Bagh Coll Dent [Internet]. 2022 Sep. 15 [cited 2024 Nov. 23];34(3):26-34. Available from: https://jbcd.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/jbcd/article/view/3214
Section
Research Articles

How to Cite

1.
Hameed WM, Radhi NJ. Dental Aerosol Hazard Prevention with Pre-procedural Antiseptic Mouthwashes (Comparative Study). J Bagh Coll Dent [Internet]. 2022 Sep. 15 [cited 2024 Nov. 23];34(3):26-34. Available from: https://jbcd.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/jbcd/article/view/3214

Publication Dates

References

Feres M, Figueiredo LC, Faveri M, Stewart B, de Vizio W. The effectiveness of a preprocedural mouthrinse containing cetylpyridinium chloride in reducing bacteria in the dental office. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2010 Apr 1;141(4):415-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0193

Toroğlu MS, Haytaç MC, Köksal F. Evaluation of aerosol contamination during debonding procedures. The Angle Orthodontist. 2001 Aug;71(4):299-306.

Souza-Gugelmin MC, Lima CD, Lima SN, Mian H, Ito IY. Microbial contamination in dental unit waterlines. Brazilian dental journal. 2003;14:55-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402003000100010

Dutil S, Mériaux A, de Latremoille MC, Lazure L, Barbeau J, Duchaine C. Measurement of airborne bacteria and endotoxin generated during dental cleaning. Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene. 2008 Dec 30;6(2):121-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15459620802633957

Leggat PA, Kedjarune U. Bacterial aerosols in the dental clinic: a review. International Dental Journal. 2001 Feb;51(1):39-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1875-595X.2001.tb00816.x

Han P, Li H, Walsh LJ, Ivanovski S. Splatters and Aerosols Contamination in Dental Aerosol Generating Procedures. Applied Sciences. 2021 Jan;11(4):1914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041914

Al-Timimi E, AL-Casey M. Effect of thymus vulgaris extract on streptococci and mutans streptococci, in comparison to chlorhexidine gluconate (in vivo study). Journal of baghdad college of dentistry. 2012;24(3):116-21.

Sethi G, Kumar K. A comparative evaluation of efficacy of 0.2% chlorhexidine with a herbal mouthwash as pre-procedural mouthrinse in the reduction of aerosol contamination produced by ultrasonic scaler. Acta Scientific Dental Sciences. 2018;2:02-6.

Ali BG, Mohsin HJ. Comparison between the effects of Aloe vera and chlorhexidine on clinical periodontal parameters.

Jones CG. Chlorhexidine: is it still the gold standard?. Periodontology 2000. 1997 Oct 1;15:55-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1997.tb00105.x

Retamal-Valdes B, Soares GM, Stewart B, Figueiredo LC, Faveri M, Miller S, Zhang YP, Feres M. Effectiveness of a pre-procedural mouthwash in reducing bacteria in dental aerosols: randomized clinical trial. Brazilian oral research. 2017 Mar 30;31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0021

Pandit S, Cai JN, Jung JE, Lee YS, Jeon JG. Effect of brief cetylpyridinium chloride treatments during early and mature cariogenic biofilm formation. Oral diseases. 2015 Jul;21(5):565-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.12312

Food and Drug Administration. Oral health care drug products for over-the-counter human use: tentative final monograph: notice of proposed rulemaking. Federal Register. 1988;53:2436-61.

Silva MF, dos Santos NB, Stewart B, DeVizio W, Proskin HM. A clinical investigation of the efficacy of a commercial mouthrinse containing 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride to control established dental plaque and gingivitis. The Journal of clinical dentistry. 2009 Jan 1;20(2):55-61.

Silness J., Löe H. Periodontal Disease in Pregnancy II. Correlation Between Oral Hygiene and Periodontal Condition, Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 1964;22:1, 121-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016356408993968

Petersen P. E., Erik P., Baez, Ramon J. World Health Organization‎. Oral health surveys: basic methods, 5th ed. World Health Organization. ‎2013

Holloman JL, Mauriello SM, Pimenta L, Arnold RR. Comparison of suction device with saliva ejector for aerosol and spatter reduction during ultrasonic scaling. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2015 Jan 1;146(1):27-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2014.10.001

Gupta G, Mitra D, Ashok KP, Gupta A, Soni S, Ahmed S, Arya A. Efficacy of preprocedural mouth rinsing in reducing aerosol contamination produced by ultrasonic scaler: a pilot study. Journal of periodontology. 2014 Apr;85(4):562-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2013.120616

Lizzadro J, Mazzotta M, Girolamini L, Dormi A, Pellati T, Cristino S. Comparison between two types of dental unit waterlines: how evaluation of microbiological contamination can support risk containment. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2019 Jan;16(3):328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16030328

Logothesis D.D., Martinez-Welles JM. Reducing bacterial aerosol contamination with a chlorhexidine gluconate pre-rinse. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 1995 Dec 1;126(12):1634-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1995.0111

Saini R. Efficacy of preprocedural mouth rinse containing chlorine dioxide in reduction of viable bacterial count in dental aerosols during ultrasonic scaling: A double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Dental Hypotheses. 2015 Apr 1;6(2):65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2155-8213.158479

AL-Kayoun, J. D., Diab, B. S. , AL-Rubaii, A. Y.. The relation of salivary glucose with dental caries and Mutans Streptococci among type1 diabetic mellitus patients aged 18-22 years. Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry. 2015, 27, 146-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12816/0015049

AL-Hayali, A. Isolation and purification of glucosyltransferase from mutans streptococci and its relation to dental caries, dental plaque and parameters of saliva Ph.D. Thesis, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad. 2002.

Najm, A. Z. and Al-Mizraqchi, A. S. “The Dental Caries Experience in Relation to Salivary Flow Rate, SIgA and Mutans Streptococci Bacteria in Smoker and Non-Smoker Patients”, Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry, 2019 31(1), 52–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26477/jbcd.v31i1.2579

Jumaa, Z., Fadil, R. & Abdul-hussain, Y.. Correlation between Caries Related Microorganisms in the Dental Plaque and Saliva with Dental Caries Level in the Upper and Lower Jaws in 5-9 Years Old Children in Baghdad City. Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry. 2016 325, 1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12816/0031120

Hasan, A. S., AL-Berfkani, M. I. & AL-Bany, Y. A.. Dental Caries and gingivitis associated with Mutans Streptococci among children. Journal of Oral and Dental Research. 2017 23, 1-10.

Kaur R, Singh I, Vandana KL, Desai R. Effect of chlorhexidine, povidone iodine, and ozone on microorganisms in dental aerosols: Randomized double-blind clinical trial. Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2014 Mar 1;25(2):160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.135910

Paul B, Baiju RM, Raseena NB, Godfrey PS, Shanimole PI. Effect of aloe vera as a preprocedural rinse in reducing aerosol contamination during ultrasonic scaling. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. 2020 Jan;24(1):37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_188_19

Nejatidanesh F, Khosravi Z, Goroohi H, Badrian H, Savabi O. Risk of contamination of different areas of dentist's face during dental practices. International journal of preventive medicine. 2013 May;4(5):611.

Bhattacharya S, Livsey SA, Wiselka M, Bukhari SS. Fusobacteriosis presenting as community acquired pneumonia. Journal of Infection. 2005 Apr 1;50(3):236-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2003.11.007

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.