FEM: Mono-implant cement retained crown with two different adhesive materials
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: The finite element method (FEM) is expected to be one of the most effective computational tools for measuring the stress on implant-supported restorations. This study was designed using the 3D-FEM to evaluate the effect of two adhesive luting types of cement on the occlusal stress and deformation of a hybrid crown cemented to a mono-implant. Materials and Method: The mono-screw STL file was imported into the CAD/CAM system library from a database supported by De-Tech Implant Technology. This was to assist in the accurate reproduction of details and design of a simulated implant abutment. Virtually, a digital crown was designed to be cemented on an abutment screw. A minimum occlusal thickness of 1mm and marginal fitting of 1.2mm was intended. An 80µm cement interface thickness for this study’s purposes was applied using U-Cem Premium and 3M RelyXTm adhesives. The FEA software meshed into tetrahedral elements. Two three-dimensional finite element models were simulated under different loads of 200N, 400N, 600N, 800N, 1000N, 1200N, and 1400N. Results: The results showed that the hybrid ceramic crown attached to a mono-implant with each adhesive cement exhibited comparable stress and strain. However, the amount of distortion was less when RelyX cement was used. Conclusion: Overall, it was advisable to use 3M RelyXTm adhesive cement up to 1400N load.
Received date: 09-05-2023
Accepted date: 10-06-2023
Published date: 15-09-2023
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licenses and Copyright
The following policy applies in The Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry (JBCD):
# JBCD applies the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license to articles and other works we publish. If you submit your paper for publication by JBCD, you agree to have the CC BY license applied to your work. Under this Open Access license, you as the author agree that anyone can reuse your article in whole or part for any purpose, for free, even for commercial purposes. Anyone may copy, distribute, or reuse the content as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This facilitates freedom in re-use and also ensures that JBCD content can be mined without barriers for the needs of research.
# If your manuscript contains content such as photos, images, figures, tables, audio files, videos, etc., that you or your co-authors do not own, we will require you to provide us with proof that the owner of that content (a) has given you written permission to use it, and (b) has approved of the CC BY license being applied to their content. We provide a form you can use to ask for and obtain permission from the owner. If you do not have owner permission, we will ask you to remove that content and/or replace it with other content that you own or have such permission to use.Don't assume that you can use any content you find on the Internet, or that the content is fair game just because it isn't clear who the owner is or what license applies.
# Many authors assume that if they previously published a paper through another publisher, they own the rights to that content and they can freely use that content in their paper, but that’s not necessarily the case, it depends on the license that covers the other paper. Some publishers allow free and unrestricted re-use of article content they own, such as under the CC BY license. Other publishers use licenses that allow re-use only if the same license is applied by the person or publisher re-using the content. If the paper was published under a CC BY license or another license that allows free and unrestricted use, you may use the content in your JBCD paper provided that you give proper attribution, as explained above.If the content was published under a more restrictive license, you must ascertain what rights you have under that license. At a minimum, review the license to make sure you can use the content. Contact that JBCD if you have any questions about the license. If the license does not permit you to use the content in a paper that will be covered by an unrestricted license, you must obtain written permission from the publisher to use the content in your JBCD paper. Please do not include any content in your JBCD paper which you do not have rights to use, and always give proper attribution.
# If any relevant accompanying data is submitted to repositories with stated licensing policies, the policies should not be more restrictive than CC BY.
# JBCD reserves the right to remove any photos, captures, images, figures, tables, illustrations, audio and video files, and the like, from any paper, whether before or after publication, if we have reason to believe that the content was included in your paper without permission from the owner of the content.
How to Cite
Publication Dates
References
Amid R, Raoofi S, Kadkhodazadeh M, Movahhedi MR, Khademi M. Effect of microthread design of dental implants on stress and strain patterns: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2013;58:457-467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2012-0108
Trivedi A, Trivedi S, Narang H, Sarkar P, Sehdev B, Pendyala G, et al. Evaluation of Pre-and Post-loading Peri-implant Crestal Bone Levels Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography: An In Vivo Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2022;23:79-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3245
Lamperti ST, Wolleb K, Hämmerle CH, Jung RE, Hüsler J, Thoma DS. Cemented versus screw‐retained zirconia‐based single‐implant restorations: 5‐year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022;33:353-361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13895
Schweitzer DM, Berg, RW, Mancia GO. A technique for retrieval of cement-retained implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;106:134-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60110-8
Askar O, Haggag M. Biological and Prosthetic Complications of Overdentures having Telescopic Attachments made from Pekkton® ivory/Zircon Vs Screw-Retained Hybrid Prosthesis in the Rehabilitation of Completely Edentulous Mandible using Four Widely Distributed Implants. A Randomized Clinical Trial. Egypt Dent J. 2022;68:1633-1646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2022.117398.1955
de Matos JD, Lopes GD, Nakano LJ, Ramos ND, Vasconcelos JE, Bottino MA, Tribst JP. Biomechanical evaluation of 3-unit fixed partial dentures on monotype and two-piece zirconia dental implants. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2022;25:239-246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2021.1946798
Ma S. Fenton, A. Screw-versus cement-retained implant prostheses: a systematic review of prosthodontic maintenance and complications. Int J Prosthodont. 2015;28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3947
Lee JI, Lee Y, Kim NY, Kim YL, Cho HW. A Photoelastic Stress Analysis of Screw‐and Cement‐Retained Implant Prostheses with Marginal Gaps. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013;15:735-749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12134
Nissan J, Narobai D, Gross O, Ghelfan O, Chaushu G. Long-term outcome of cemented versus screw-retained im-plant-supported partial restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26:1102.
Sailer I, Mühlemann S, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CH, Schneider D. Cemented and screw‐retained implant reconstructions: a systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:163-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02538.x
Freitas Jr AC, Bonfante EA, Martins LM, Silva NR, Marotta L, Coelho PG. Reliability and failure modes of anterior single‐unit implant‐supported restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:1005-1011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02269.x
Ghasemi E, Abedian A, Iranmanesh P, Khazaei S. Effect of type of luting agents on stress distribution in the bone sur-rounding implants supporting a three-unit fixed dental prosthesis: 3D finite element analysis. Dent Res J. 2015;12:57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.150332
Turker N, Özarslan MM, Buyukkaplan US, Başar EK. Effect of Different Surface Treatments Applied to Short Zirconia and Titanium Abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020;35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.8224
Rohr N, Coldea A, Zitzmann NU, Fischer J. Loading capacity of zirconia implant supported hybrid ceramic crowns. Dent Mater. 2015;31:e279-e288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.012
Rohr N, Maertin S, Fischer J. Correlations between fracture load of zirconia implant supported single crowns and mechanical properties of restorative material and cement. Dent Mater J. 2018:2017-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2017-111
Kelly JR. Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81:652-661. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70103-4
Cervino G, Romeo U, Lauritano F, Bramanti E, Fiorillo L, D’Amico C, et al. Fem and von mises analysis of OSSTEM® dental implant structural components: Evaluation of different direction dynamic loads. Open Dent J. 2018;12:219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601812010219
Shakir SM, Muhsin SA, Al Marza R. Finite Element Modelling Based Studies for Dental Implants: Systematic Review. Journal of Techniques. 2022;4:155-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51173/jt.v4i33.771
Mendes Tribst JP, Marques de Melo R, Souto Borges AL, Othávio de Assunção e Souza R, Bottino MA. Mechanical Behavior of Different Micro Conical Abutments in Fixed Prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.6578
O'Mahony AM, Williams JL, Spencer P. Anisotropic elasticity of cortical and cancellous bone in the posterior mandible in-creases peri‐implant stress and strain under oblique loading. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:648-657. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120614.x
Roateşi I, Roateşi S. Numerical FEM modeling in dental implantology. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2016;1738:350003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4952126
Ausiello P, Di Lauro AE, Tribst JP, Watts DC. Stress distribution in resin-based CAD-CAM implant-supported crowns. Dent Mater. 2023;39:114-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2022.12.001
May LG, Kelly JR, Bottino MA, Hill T. Effects of cement thickness and bonding on the failure loads of CAD/CAM ceramic crowns: multi-physics FEA modeling and monotonic testing. Dent Mater. 2012;28:e99-e109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.033
Arularasan R, Hemanandhan P, Thamizhselvan T, Arunkumar B. Modeling and simulation of engine cylinder fins by using FEA r. arularasan1, p. hemanandhan1, t. thamizhselvan2, b. arunkumar2, s. senthilnathan2, s. prathap2. Int J. 2016;4:1391-1396.
Ahmed SAS, Eldosoky MA, El-Wakad MT, Agamy EM. Effect of stiffness of single implant supported crowns on the resultant stresses. A finite element analysis. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2018;63:172-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12816/0023843
Ding H, Cui Z, Maghami E, Chen Y, Matinlinna JP, Pow EH, et al. Morphology and mechanical performance of dental crown designed by 3D-DCGAN. Dent Mater. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2023.02.001
Thaungwilai K, Tantilertanant Y, Singhatanadgit W, Singhatanadgid P. Finite Element Analysis of the Mechanical Perfor-mance of Non-Restorable Crownless Primary Molars Restored with Intracoronal Core-Supported Crowns: A Proposed Treatment Alternative to Extraction for Severe Early Childhood Caries. J Clin Med. 2023;12:1872. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051872
Duan Y, Griggs JA. Effect of elasticity on stress distribution in CAD/CAM dental crowns: Glass ceramic vs. polymer–matrix composite. J Dent. 2015;43:742-749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.01.008
Weyhrauch M, Igiel C, Scheller H, Weibrich G, Lehmann KM. Fracture Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Crowns on Ti-tanium Implant Abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.4601
Awada A, Nathanson D. Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114:587-593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.016
Nejatidanesh F, Savabi O, Shahtoosi M. Retention of implant‐supported zirconium oxide ceramic restorations using different luting agents. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24:20-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02358.x
Alvarez-Arenal A, Gonzalez-Gonzalez I, deLlanos-Lanchares H, Brizuela-Velasco A, Ellacuria-Echebarria J. The selection criteria of temporary or permanent luting agents in implant-supported prostheses: in vitro study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016;8:144-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.2.144
Sathyanarayan S, Balavadivel T, Guru RC, Sande AR, Rajendran V, Sengottaiyan AK. Retention of various luting agents used with implant-supported crowns. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021;13:S1206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_385_21
Al Marza R. Effect of the interface geometry on the structural integrity of the ceramic crown-tooth complex. Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health 2015;PhD:129-130.
Dauti R, Lilaj B, Heimel P, Moritz A, Schedle A, Cvikl B. Influence of two different cement space settings and three different cement types on the fit of polymer-infiltrated ceramic network material crowns manufactured using a complete digital workflow. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24:1929-1938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03053-1
Syed AU, Rokaya D, Shahrbaf S, Martin N. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution in a tooth restored with full coverage machined polymer crown. Appl Sci. 2021;11:1220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11031220
Hosseini-Faradonbeh SA, Katoozian HR. Biomechanical evaluations of the long-term stability of dental implant using finite element modeling method: a systematic review. J Adv Prosthodont. 2022;14:182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2022.14.3.182