The relationship of implant stability quotient and insertion torque in dental implant stability
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: The insertion torque (IT) values and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values are the measurements most used to assess primary implant stability. This study aimed to assess the relationship between ISQ values and IT. Materials and methods: This study included 24 patients with a mean (SD) age of 47.9 (13.64) years (range 25-75 years). The patients received 42 dental implants (DI), 33 in the mandible and 9 in the maxilla. The DI were installed using the motorized method with 35 Ncm torque, When DI could not be inserted to the requisite depth by the motorized method, a hand ratchet was used and the IT was recorded as ˃ 35 Ncm. Implant stability was measured utilizing Osstell® ISQ. The secondary stability was measured after 16 weeks postoperatively.Results: The DI installed in mandible demonstrated significantly higher primary stability ISQ values than those installed in maxilla (P=0.0101). There was no such significant correlation linked between the secondary stability and the recipient jaw (P=0.2026). A non-significant correlation was found between the primary and secondary implant stability ISQ values and IT (P=0.2785 and 0.4194, respectively). No significant difference was reported regarding the IT relative to the recipient jaw of DI (P=0.1349).Conclusion: This study demonstrated that there was no relationship between the ISQ values and the IT, and that they should be used independently. DI installed in mandible demonstrated significantly higher primary stability ISQ values than those installed in maxilla. Also, there was a non-significant correlation of the secondary stability and IT with the recipient jaw.
Received date: 1-11-2021
Accepted date:: 5-12-2021
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licenses and Copyright
The following policy applies in The Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry (JBCD):
# JBCD applies the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license to articles and other works we publish. If you submit your paper for publication by JBCD, you agree to have the CC BY license applied to your work. Under this Open Access license, you as the author agree that anyone can reuse your article in whole or part for any purpose, for free, even for commercial purposes. Anyone may copy, distribute, or reuse the content as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This facilitates freedom in re-use and also ensures that JBCD content can be mined without barriers for the needs of research.
# If your manuscript contains content such as photos, images, figures, tables, audio files, videos, etc., that you or your co-authors do not own, we will require you to provide us with proof that the owner of that content (a) has given you written permission to use it, and (b) has approved of the CC BY license being applied to their content. We provide a form you can use to ask for and obtain permission from the owner. If you do not have owner permission, we will ask you to remove that content and/or replace it with other content that you own or have such permission to use.Don't assume that you can use any content you find on the Internet, or that the content is fair game just because it isn't clear who the owner is or what license applies.
# Many authors assume that if they previously published a paper through another publisher, they own the rights to that content and they can freely use that content in their paper, but that’s not necessarily the case, it depends on the license that covers the other paper. Some publishers allow free and unrestricted re-use of article content they own, such as under the CC BY license. Other publishers use licenses that allow re-use only if the same license is applied by the person or publisher re-using the content. If the paper was published under a CC BY license or another license that allows free and unrestricted use, you may use the content in your JBCD paper provided that you give proper attribution, as explained above.If the content was published under a more restrictive license, you must ascertain what rights you have under that license. At a minimum, review the license to make sure you can use the content. Contact that JBCD if you have any questions about the license. If the license does not permit you to use the content in a paper that will be covered by an unrestricted license, you must obtain written permission from the publisher to use the content in your JBCD paper. Please do not include any content in your JBCD paper which you do not have rights to use, and always give proper attribution.
# If any relevant accompanying data is submitted to repositories with stated licensing policies, the policies should not be more restrictive than CC BY.
# JBCD reserves the right to remove any photos, captures, images, figures, tables, illustrations, audio and video files, and the like, from any paper, whether before or after publication, if we have reason to believe that the content was included in your paper without permission from the owner of the content.
How to Cite
Publication Dates
References
Turkyilmaz I, Tözüm TF, Tumer C. Bone density assessments of oral implant sites using computerized tomography. J Oral Rehabil. 2007;34(4):267–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01689.x
Mesa F, Muñoz R, Noguerol B, et al. Multivariate study of factors influencing primary dental implant stability. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(2):196–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01450.x
Sennerby L. MN. Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis : biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. Periodontol 2000. 2008;47:51–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2008.00267.x
Meyer U, Joos U, Mythili J, et al. Ultrastructural characterization of the implant/bone interface of immediately loaded dental implants. Biomaterials. 2004;25(10):1959–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.070
Sachdeva A, Dhawan P, Sindwani S. Assessment of Implant Stability: Methods and Recent Advances. Br J Med Med Res. 2016;12(3):1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/BJMMR/2016/21877
Lages FS, Douglas-de Oliveira DW, Costa FO. Relationship between implant stability measurements obtained by insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis: A systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20(1):26–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12565
Lozano-Carrascal N, Salomó-Coll O, Gilabert-Cerdà M, et al. Effect of implant macro-design on primary stability: A prospective clinical study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016;21(2):e214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.21024
Levin BP. The correlation between immediate implant insertion torque and implant stability quotient. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent. 2016;36(6):833–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2865
Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996;7(3):261–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070308.x
Jaramillo R, Santos R, Lázaro P, et al. Comparative analysis of 2 resonance frequency measurement devices: Osstell Mentor and Osstell ISQ. Implant Dent. 2014;23(3):351–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000072
Degidi M, Daprile G, Piattelli A. Primary stability determination of implants inserted in sinus augmented sites: 1-step versus 2-step procedure. Implant Dent. 2013;22(5):530–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e31829f1ef2
Farré-pagès N, Augé-castro ML, Alaejos-algarra F, et al. Relation between bone density and primary implant stability. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011;16(1):62–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.16.e62
Salimov F, Tatli U, Kürkçü M, et al. Evaluation of relationship between preoperative bone density values derived from cone beam computed tomography and implant stability parameters: A clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(9):1016–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12219
Di Stefano DA, Arosio P, Pagnutti S, et al. Distribution of Trabecular Bone Density in the Maxilla and Mandible. Implant Dent. 2019;28(4):340–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000893
Strub Jr, Jurdzik Ba, Tuna T. Prognosis of immediately loaded implants and their restorations: a systematic literature review. J Oral Rehabil. 2012;39(9):704–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2012.02315.x
Song Y-D, Jun S-H, Kwon J-J. Correlation between bone quality evaluated by cone-beam computerized tomography and implant primary stability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24(1):59–64.
Merheb J, Vercruyssen M, Coucke W, et al. Relationship of implant stability and bone density derived from computerized tomography images. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20(1):50–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12579
Al-Jamal MFJ, Al-Jumaily HA. Can the Bone Density Estimated by CBCT Predict the Primary Stability of Dental Implants? A New Measurement Protocol. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(2):e171–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000006991
Youssef M, Shaaban AM, Eldibany R. the Correlation Between Bone Density and Implant Stability. Alexandria Dent J. 2015;40(1):15–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/adjalexu.2015.58726
Gómez-Polo M, Ortega R, Gómez-Polo C, et al. Does Length, Diameter, or Bone Quality Affect Primary and Secondary Stability in Self-Tapping Dental Implants? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74(7):1344–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.03.011
Degidi M, Daprile G, Piattelli A. Primary stability determination by means of insertion torque and RFA in a sample of 4,135 implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(4):501–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00302.x
Açil Y, Sievers J, Gülses A, et al. Correlation between resonance frequency, insertion torque and bone-implant contact in self-cutting threaded implants. Odontology. 2017;105(3):347–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-016-0265-2