The Effect of Recipient Jaw and Implant Dimensions on Pre- and Post- Loading Dental Implant Stability: A Prospective Clinical Study

Main Article Content

Dhuha A Al-Assaf
Salwan Y Bede

Abstract

Background: Implant stability is a mandatory factor for dental implant (DI) osseointegration and long-term success. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of implant length, diameter, and recipient jaw on the pre- and post-functional loading stability.
Materials and methods: This study included 17 healthy patients with an age range of 24-61 years. Twenty-two DI were inserted into healed extraction sockets to replace missing tooth/ teeth in premolar and molar regions in upper and lower jaws. Implant stability was measured for each implant and was recorded as implant stability quotient (ISQ) immediately (ISQ0), and at 8 (ISQ8) and 12 (ISQ12) weeks postoperatively, as well as post-functional loading (ISQPFL). The pattern of implant stability changes throughout the study period and its correlation with the recipient jaw and the DI dimensions were evaluated.
Results: There was a significant difference in ISQ values throughout the study. DI stability in the maxilla was significantly higher than that in mandible for the ISQ0, with no significant effect for the rest time points. The effect of implant diameter was significant with DI of 4.1mm diameter being more stable. While for the length, there was no significant difference regarding its effect on ISQ values through-out the study period.
Conclusions: DI inserted in the maxilla demonstrated better primary stability with no effect of recipient jaw on secondary stability and after functional loading, also DI with wider diameter had better stability throughout the study whereas DI length showed no significant effect on stability

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Al-Assaf DA, Bede SY. The Effect of Recipient Jaw and Implant Dimensions on Pre- and Post- Loading Dental Implant Stability: A Prospective Clinical Study. J Bagh Coll Dent [Internet]. 2021 Dec. 15 [cited 2024 Nov. 2];33(4):31-7. Available from: https://jbcd.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/jbcd/article/view/3017
Section
Research Articles

How to Cite

1.
Al-Assaf DA, Bede SY. The Effect of Recipient Jaw and Implant Dimensions on Pre- and Post- Loading Dental Implant Stability: A Prospective Clinical Study. J Bagh Coll Dent [Internet]. 2021 Dec. 15 [cited 2024 Nov. 2];33(4):31-7. Available from: https://jbcd.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/jbcd/article/view/3017

Publication Dates

References

Ghanem WA, Sadakah AA. Effect of implant length on the stability and osseointegration of immediate implant. Egypt J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 7:41–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.OMX.0000481452.49607.ad

Raghavendra S, Wood MC, Taylor TD. Early wound healing around endosseous implants: A review of literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 20: 425.

Olate S, Lyrio MCN, de Moraes M, et al. Influence of diameter and length of implant on early dental implant failure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 68: 414-419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.10.002

Quesada-García MP, Prados-Sánchez E, Olmedo-Gaya MV, et al. Dental implant stability is influenced by implant diameter and localization and by use of plasma rich in growth factors. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 70: 2761-2767. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2012.08.006

Simmons DE, Maney P, Teitelbaum AG, et al. Comparative evaluation of the stability of two different dental implant designs and surgical protocols—a pilot study. Int J Implant Dent. 2017; 3:16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-017-0078-2

Lachmann S, Laval JY, Axmann D, et al. In¬fluence of implant geometry on primary insertion stability and simulated peri-implant bone loss: an in vitro study using resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Int J Oral Max¬illofac Implants. 2011;26(2):347-55.

Kastala VH. Methods to measure implant stability. J Dent Implant. 2018; 8:3-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jdi.jdi_7_18

Romero-Ruiz MM, Gil-Mur FJ, Ríos-Santos JV, et al. Influence of a Novel Surface of Bioactive Implants on Osseointegration: A Comparative and Histomorphometric Correlation and Implant Stability Study in Minipigs. Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20(9): 2307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20092307

Bafijari D, Benedetti A, Stamatoski A, et al. Influence of Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) Measurements for Successful Osseointegration of Dental Implants During the Healing Period and Its Impact on Implant Assessed by Osstell Mentor Device. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019; 7(23):4110-4115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.716

Lioubavina-Hack N, Lang NP, Karring T. Significance of primary stability for osseointegration of dental implants. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2006; 17: 244–250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01201.x

Dawson A, Chen S, Buser D, et al. The SAC classification in implant dentistry. Berlin: Quintessence 2009

Sennerby L, Meredith N. Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: Biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. Periodontol 2000. 2008; 47:51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2008.00267.x

Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Lang NP, et al. De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants. A model study in the dog. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2003; 14: 251-262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00972.x

Han J, Lulic M, Lang NP. Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell mentor during implant tissue integration: II. Implant surface modification and implant diameter. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21(6): 605-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01909.x

Koshy AT, Mathew TA, Mathew N, et al. Assessment of implant stability during various stages of healing placed immediately following extraction in an overdenture situation. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017; 17:74-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.176530

Rosen, P.S., Meredith, N., Reynolds, M.A. Case reports describing the "bump": a new phenomenon in implant healing. J Implant Adv Clin Dent. 2010; 2: 27-37.

Javed F, Ahmed HB, Crespi R, et al. Role of primary stability for successful osseointegration of dental implants: Factors of influence and evaluation. Interv Med Appl Sci. 2013; 5 (4): 162–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/imas.5.2013.4.3

Vollmer A, Saravi B, Lang G, et al. Factors influencing primary and secondary implant stability- A retrospective cohort study with 582 implants in 272 patients. Appl Sci. 2020; 10: 8084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app10228084

Gómez-Polo M, Ortega R, Gómez-Polo C, et al. Does length, diameter, or bone quality affect primary and secondary stability in self-tapping dental implants? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 74:1344-1353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.03.011

Huang Y, Van Dessel J, Liang X, et al. Effects of immediate and delayed loading on peri-implant trabecular structures: a cone beam CT evaluation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014; 16:873–883. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12063

Akoğlan M, Tatli U, Kurtoğlu C, et al. Effects of different loading protocols on the secondary stability and peri-implant bone density of the single implants in the posterior maxilla. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017; 19(4): 624-631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12492

Frost HM. Wolff’s Law and bone’s structural adaptations to mechanical usage: an overview for clinicians. Angle Orthod. 1994; 64:175–88.

Himmlova L, Dostalova T, Kacovsky A, et al. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91:20-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.08.008

Winkler S, Morris HF, Ochi S. Implant survival to 36 months as related to length and diameter. Ann Periodontol 2000; 5:22-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.22

Sabeva E. Comparison between the influence of implant diameter and implant length of the primary stability. Scr sci med. 2018; 4(2):36-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14748/ssmd.v4i2.5635

Nappo A, Rengo C, Pantaleo G, et al. Influence of implant dimensions and position on implant stability: A prospective clinical study in maxilla using resonance frequency analysis. Appl Sci. 2019; 9: 860 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app9050860

Rengo C, Nappo A, Pantaleo G, et al. Influence of implant dimensions and position on primary and secondary implant stability: a prospective clinical study in the mandible using resonance frequency analysis. J Osseointegr. 2020; 12(1): 34-38.

Hong J, Lim YJ, Park SO. Quantitative biomechanical analysis of the influence of the cortical bone and implant length on primary stability. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23(10):1193–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02285.x

Huang H-L, Tsai M-T, Su K-C, et al. Relation between initial implant stability quotient and bone-implant contact percentage: an in vitro model study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2013; 116(5): e356–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2012.01.037

Bataineh AB, Al-dakes AM. The influence of length of implant on pri¬mary stability: An in vitro study using resonance frequency analysis. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017; 9(1): e1-6.

Aragoneses JM, Aragoneses J, Brugal VA, et al. Relationship between Implant Length and Implant Stability of Single-Implant Restorations: A 12-Month Follow-Up Clinical Study. Medicina. 2020; 56: 263 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56060263

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.