The Effect of Recipient Jaw and Implant Dimensions on Pre- and Post- Loading Dental Implant Stability: A Prospective Clinical Study
Main Article Content
Abstract
Materials and methods: This study included 17 healthy patients with an age range of 24-61 years. Twenty-two DI were inserted into healed extraction sockets to replace missing tooth/ teeth in premolar and molar regions in upper and lower jaws. Implant stability was measured for each implant and was recorded as implant stability quotient (ISQ) immediately (ISQ0), and at 8 (ISQ8) and 12 (ISQ12) weeks postoperatively, as well as post-functional loading (ISQPFL). The pattern of implant stability changes throughout the study period and its correlation with the recipient jaw and the DI dimensions were evaluated.
Results: There was a significant difference in ISQ values throughout the study. DI stability in the maxilla was significantly higher than that in mandible for the ISQ0, with no significant effect for the rest time points. The effect of implant diameter was significant with DI of 4.1mm diameter being more stable. While for the length, there was no significant difference regarding its effect on ISQ values through-out the study period.
Conclusions: DI inserted in the maxilla demonstrated better primary stability with no effect of recipient jaw on secondary stability and after functional loading, also DI with wider diameter had better stability throughout the study whereas DI length showed no significant effect on stability
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licenses and Copyright
The following policy applies in The Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry (JBCD):
# JBCD applies the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license to articles and other works we publish. If you submit your paper for publication by JBCD, you agree to have the CC BY license applied to your work. Under this Open Access license, you as the author agree that anyone can reuse your article in whole or part for any purpose, for free, even for commercial purposes. Anyone may copy, distribute, or reuse the content as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This facilitates freedom in re-use and also ensures that JBCD content can be mined without barriers for the needs of research.
# If your manuscript contains content such as photos, images, figures, tables, audio files, videos, etc., that you or your co-authors do not own, we will require you to provide us with proof that the owner of that content (a) has given you written permission to use it, and (b) has approved of the CC BY license being applied to their content. We provide a form you can use to ask for and obtain permission from the owner. If you do not have owner permission, we will ask you to remove that content and/or replace it with other content that you own or have such permission to use.Don't assume that you can use any content you find on the Internet, or that the content is fair game just because it isn't clear who the owner is or what license applies.
# Many authors assume that if they previously published a paper through another publisher, they own the rights to that content and they can freely use that content in their paper, but that’s not necessarily the case, it depends on the license that covers the other paper. Some publishers allow free and unrestricted re-use of article content they own, such as under the CC BY license. Other publishers use licenses that allow re-use only if the same license is applied by the person or publisher re-using the content. If the paper was published under a CC BY license or another license that allows free and unrestricted use, you may use the content in your JBCD paper provided that you give proper attribution, as explained above.If the content was published under a more restrictive license, you must ascertain what rights you have under that license. At a minimum, review the license to make sure you can use the content. Contact that JBCD if you have any questions about the license. If the license does not permit you to use the content in a paper that will be covered by an unrestricted license, you must obtain written permission from the publisher to use the content in your JBCD paper. Please do not include any content in your JBCD paper which you do not have rights to use, and always give proper attribution.
# If any relevant accompanying data is submitted to repositories with stated licensing policies, the policies should not be more restrictive than CC BY.
# JBCD reserves the right to remove any photos, captures, images, figures, tables, illustrations, audio and video files, and the like, from any paper, whether before or after publication, if we have reason to believe that the content was included in your paper without permission from the owner of the content.
How to Cite
Publication Dates
References
Ghanem WA, Sadakah AA. Effect of implant length on the stability and osseointegration of immediate implant. Egypt J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 7:41–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.OMX.0000481452.49607.ad
Raghavendra S, Wood MC, Taylor TD. Early wound healing around endosseous implants: A review of literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 20: 425.
Olate S, Lyrio MCN, de Moraes M, et al. Influence of diameter and length of implant on early dental implant failure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 68: 414-419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.10.002
Quesada-García MP, Prados-Sánchez E, Olmedo-Gaya MV, et al. Dental implant stability is influenced by implant diameter and localization and by use of plasma rich in growth factors. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 70: 2761-2767. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2012.08.006
Simmons DE, Maney P, Teitelbaum AG, et al. Comparative evaluation of the stability of two different dental implant designs and surgical protocols—a pilot study. Int J Implant Dent. 2017; 3:16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-017-0078-2
Lachmann S, Laval JY, Axmann D, et al. In¬fluence of implant geometry on primary insertion stability and simulated peri-implant bone loss: an in vitro study using resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment. Int J Oral Max¬illofac Implants. 2011;26(2):347-55.
Kastala VH. Methods to measure implant stability. J Dent Implant. 2018; 8:3-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jdi.jdi_7_18
Romero-Ruiz MM, Gil-Mur FJ, Ríos-Santos JV, et al. Influence of a Novel Surface of Bioactive Implants on Osseointegration: A Comparative and Histomorphometric Correlation and Implant Stability Study in Minipigs. Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20(9): 2307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20092307
Bafijari D, Benedetti A, Stamatoski A, et al. Influence of Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) Measurements for Successful Osseointegration of Dental Implants During the Healing Period and Its Impact on Implant Assessed by Osstell Mentor Device. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019; 7(23):4110-4115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.716
Lioubavina-Hack N, Lang NP, Karring T. Significance of primary stability for osseointegration of dental implants. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2006; 17: 244–250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01201.x
Dawson A, Chen S, Buser D, et al. The SAC classification in implant dentistry. Berlin: Quintessence 2009
Sennerby L, Meredith N. Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: Biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. Periodontol 2000. 2008; 47:51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2008.00267.x
Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Lang NP, et al. De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants. A model study in the dog. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2003; 14: 251-262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00972.x
Han J, Lulic M, Lang NP. Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell mentor during implant tissue integration: II. Implant surface modification and implant diameter. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21(6): 605-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01909.x
Koshy AT, Mathew TA, Mathew N, et al. Assessment of implant stability during various stages of healing placed immediately following extraction in an overdenture situation. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017; 17:74-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.176530
Rosen, P.S., Meredith, N., Reynolds, M.A. Case reports describing the "bump": a new phenomenon in implant healing. J Implant Adv Clin Dent. 2010; 2: 27-37.
Javed F, Ahmed HB, Crespi R, et al. Role of primary stability for successful osseointegration of dental implants: Factors of influence and evaluation. Interv Med Appl Sci. 2013; 5 (4): 162–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/imas.5.2013.4.3
Vollmer A, Saravi B, Lang G, et al. Factors influencing primary and secondary implant stability- A retrospective cohort study with 582 implants in 272 patients. Appl Sci. 2020; 10: 8084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app10228084
Gómez-Polo M, Ortega R, Gómez-Polo C, et al. Does length, diameter, or bone quality affect primary and secondary stability in self-tapping dental implants? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 74:1344-1353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.03.011
Huang Y, Van Dessel J, Liang X, et al. Effects of immediate and delayed loading on peri-implant trabecular structures: a cone beam CT evaluation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014; 16:873–883. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12063
Akoğlan M, Tatli U, Kurtoğlu C, et al. Effects of different loading protocols on the secondary stability and peri-implant bone density of the single implants in the posterior maxilla. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017; 19(4): 624-631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12492
Frost HM. Wolff’s Law and bone’s structural adaptations to mechanical usage: an overview for clinicians. Angle Orthod. 1994; 64:175–88.
Himmlova L, Dostalova T, Kacovsky A, et al. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91:20-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.08.008
Winkler S, Morris HF, Ochi S. Implant survival to 36 months as related to length and diameter. Ann Periodontol 2000; 5:22-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.22
Sabeva E. Comparison between the influence of implant diameter and implant length of the primary stability. Scr sci med. 2018; 4(2):36-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14748/ssmd.v4i2.5635
Nappo A, Rengo C, Pantaleo G, et al. Influence of implant dimensions and position on implant stability: A prospective clinical study in maxilla using resonance frequency analysis. Appl Sci. 2019; 9: 860 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app9050860
Rengo C, Nappo A, Pantaleo G, et al. Influence of implant dimensions and position on primary and secondary implant stability: a prospective clinical study in the mandible using resonance frequency analysis. J Osseointegr. 2020; 12(1): 34-38.
Hong J, Lim YJ, Park SO. Quantitative biomechanical analysis of the influence of the cortical bone and implant length on primary stability. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23(10):1193–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02285.x
Huang H-L, Tsai M-T, Su K-C, et al. Relation between initial implant stability quotient and bone-implant contact percentage: an in vitro model study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2013; 116(5): e356–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2012.01.037
Bataineh AB, Al-dakes AM. The influence of length of implant on pri¬mary stability: An in vitro study using resonance frequency analysis. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017; 9(1): e1-6.
Aragoneses JM, Aragoneses J, Brugal VA, et al. Relationship between Implant Length and Implant Stability of Single-Implant Restorations: A 12-Month Follow-Up Clinical Study. Medicina. 2020; 56: 263 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56060263