Reliability of the multipeg™ transducer in measuring dental implant stability by using a resonance frequency analysis device (Osstell®): An observational clinical study
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Measuring implant stability is an important issue in predicting treatment success. Dental implant stability is usually measured through resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Osstell® RFA devices can be used with transducers (Smartpeg™) that correspond to the implants used as well as with transducers designed for application with Penguin® RFA devices (Multipeg™). Aims: This study aims to assess the reliability of a MultiPeg™ transducer with an Osstell® device in measuring dental implant stability. Materials and Methods: Sixteen healthy participants who required dental implant treatment were enrolled in this study. Implant stability was measured by using an Osstell® device with two transducers, namely, Smartpeg™ and Multipeg™. Insertion torque was also measured and recorded as >50 and ≤50 N·cm. Unpaired t-test and Mann–Whitney U test were conducted to assess the relationships of the implant stability values obtained by the two transducers with insertion torque, whereas Pearson and Spearman's correlations were utilized to investigate correlations between the two transducers. Interclass correlation coefficients were applied to assess the reliability between the two transducers. Results: Implant stability measurements (primary and secondary) showed strong positive correlations between Smartpeg™ and Multipeg™. The reliability values between both transducers in primary and secondary implant stability measurements were 0.922 and 0.981, respectively. The use of both transducers revealed higher implant stability measurements for implants inserted with insertion torque > 50 N·cm than those inserted with insertion torque ≤ 50 N·cm. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the Multipeg™ transducer is reliable in measuring the stability of dental implants using an Osstell® device.
Received date: 12-06-2023
Accepted date: 16-08-2023
Published date: 15-09-2023
Downloads
Article Details
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licenses and Copyright
The following policy applies in The Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry (JBCD):
# JBCD applies the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license to articles and other works we publish. If you submit your paper for publication by JBCD, you agree to have the CC BY license applied to your work. Under this Open Access license, you as the author agree that anyone can reuse your article in whole or part for any purpose, for free, even for commercial purposes. Anyone may copy, distribute, or reuse the content as long as the author and original source are properly cited. This facilitates freedom in re-use and also ensures that JBCD content can be mined without barriers for the needs of research.
# If your manuscript contains content such as photos, images, figures, tables, audio files, videos, etc., that you or your co-authors do not own, we will require you to provide us with proof that the owner of that content (a) has given you written permission to use it, and (b) has approved of the CC BY license being applied to their content. We provide a form you can use to ask for and obtain permission from the owner. If you do not have owner permission, we will ask you to remove that content and/or replace it with other content that you own or have such permission to use.Don't assume that you can use any content you find on the Internet, or that the content is fair game just because it isn't clear who the owner is or what license applies.
# Many authors assume that if they previously published a paper through another publisher, they own the rights to that content and they can freely use that content in their paper, but that’s not necessarily the case, it depends on the license that covers the other paper. Some publishers allow free and unrestricted re-use of article content they own, such as under the CC BY license. Other publishers use licenses that allow re-use only if the same license is applied by the person or publisher re-using the content. If the paper was published under a CC BY license or another license that allows free and unrestricted use, you may use the content in your JBCD paper provided that you give proper attribution, as explained above.If the content was published under a more restrictive license, you must ascertain what rights you have under that license. At a minimum, review the license to make sure you can use the content. Contact that JBCD if you have any questions about the license. If the license does not permit you to use the content in a paper that will be covered by an unrestricted license, you must obtain written permission from the publisher to use the content in your JBCD paper. Please do not include any content in your JBCD paper which you do not have rights to use, and always give proper attribution.
# If any relevant accompanying data is submitted to repositories with stated licensing policies, the policies should not be more restrictive than CC BY.
# JBCD reserves the right to remove any photos, captures, images, figures, tables, illustrations, audio and video files, and the like, from any paper, whether before or after publication, if we have reason to believe that the content was included in your paper without permission from the owner of the content.
How to Cite
References
Abdul Lateef T. The effect The Effect Of Treatment Protocol and Implant Dimensions on Primary Stability Utilizing Reso-nance Frequency Analysis. J Bagh Coll Dent. 2017;29:111-16.
Swami V, Vijayaraghavan V, Swami V. Current trends to measure implant stability. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2016;16:124-30.
Noaman AT, Bede SY. The Effect of Bone Density Measured by Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Implant Dimensions on the Stability of Dental Implants. J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33:E553–7.
Gómez-Polo M, Ortega R, Gómez-Polo C, Martín C, Celemín A, del Río J. Does Length, Diameter, or Bone Quality Affect Primary and Secondary Stability in Self-Tapping Dental Implants?. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74:1344–53.
Kittur N, Oak R, Dekate D, Jadhav S, Dhatrak P. Dental implant stability and its measurements to improve osseointegration at the bone-implant interface: A review. Mater Today Proc. 2020;43:1064–70.
Alattar AN, Bede SYH. Does Mixed Conventional/Piezosurgery Implant Site Preparation Affect Implant Stability?. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29:e472–5.
Ibraheem NS, Al-Adili SS. Assessment of dental Assessment of dental implant stability during healing period and determi-nation of the factors that affect implant stability by means of resonance frequency analysis (Clinical study). J Bagh Coll Dent. 2015;27:109-15.
Becker W, Hujoel P, Becker BE. Resonance frequency analysis: Comparing two clinical instruments. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20:308–12.
Buyukguclu G, Ozkurt-Kayahan Z, Kazazoglu E. Reliability of the osstell implant stability quotient and penguin resonance frequency analysis to evaluate implant stability. Implant Dent. 2018;27:429–33.
Bural C, Dayan C, Geçkili O. Initial stability measurements of implants using a new magnetic resonance frequency analyzer with titanium transducers: An ex vivo study. J Oral Implantol. 2020;46:35–40.
Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Ob-servational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration. Int J Surg. 2014;12:1500–24.
World Medical Association. World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research in-volving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310:2191–4.
Martin Kjaergaard, Vinh GN, Jan B, Joanne P, Paul MW. Comparison of Implant Stability Between Conventional Drilling and Piezosurgical Implant Bed Preparation Techniques. J Oral Implant. 2021;1;49:79–84.
Huwiler MA, Pjetursson BE, Bosshardt DD, Salvi GE, Lang NP. Resonance frequency analysis in relation to jawbone charac-teristics and during early healing of implant installation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:275–80.
Andreotti AM, Goiato MC, Nobrega AS, Freitas da Silva EV, Filho HG, Pellizzer EP, et al. Relationship Between Implant Stability Measurements Obtained by Two Different Devices: A Systematic Review. J Periodontol. 2017;88:281–8.
Rowan M, Lee D, Pi-Anfruns J, Shiffler P, Aghaloo T, Moy PK. Mechanical versus biological stability of immediate and de-layed implant placement using resonance frequency analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73:253–7.
Chávarri-Prado D, Brizuela-Velasco A, Diéguez-Pereira M, Pérez-Pevida E, Jiménez-Garrudo A, Viteri-Agustín I, et al. In-fluence of cortical bone and implant design in the primary stability of dental implants measured by two different devices of resonance frequency analysis: An in vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020;12:e242–8.
Herrero-Climent M, Falcão A, López-Jarana P, Díaz-Castro CM, Ríos-Carrasco B, Ríos-Santos JV. In vitro comparative anal-ysis of two resonance frequency measurement devices: Osstell implant stability coefficient and Penguin resonance frequency analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21:1124–31.
Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15:155–63.
Zita Gomes R, De Vasconcelos MR, Lopes Guerra IM, De Almeida RAB, De Campos Felino AC. Implant Stability in the Pos-terior Maxilla: A Controlled Clinical Trial. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017.